High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "private employment"
1950 result(s) found
Found 1950 result(s)
High Court
- 18
High Court
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....
- 45
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.
11 Jul 2014The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...
- 49
High Court
KAHC010000842011_1
11 Jul 2014The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
9 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...
- 386
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.
4 Oct 2024The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...
- 1354
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Educational Institute in Gratuity Dispute — Teacher Held Entitled to Gratuity Under Amended Definition. The Court applied the retrospective amendment to Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which included teachers as employees, and upheld the orders of the controlling authority and High Court.
7 Mar 2019The appeal arose from a dispute between Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) and a retired Assistant Professor (respondent No.4) regarding payment of g...
- 270
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Institute's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Retrospective Amendment Covers Teachers Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Teacher's Claim for Gratuity Upheld as Amended Definition of 'Employee' Includes Teachers with Retrospective Effect from 1997.
7 Mar 2019The Supreme Court of India dealt with an appeal by Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) against the State of Jharkhand and others, concerning the entit...
- 357
