Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance to Wife in Matrimonial Dispute. Voluntary Deductions Like Provident Fund and Employee Stock Purchase Plans Cannot Reduce Monthly Income for Maintenance Purposes Under Sections 24 and 26 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a matrimonial discord between the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband, who were married on 09.12.2004 and had two sons born in 2011 and 2014. After the husband left the family home in 2018, the wife filed a divorce petition and an application under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking interim maintenance for herself and the children. The Family Court initially awarded child maintenance of Rs.37,000 per child per month (later enhanced to Rs.40,000) but declined maintenance for the wife. This order was affirmed by the High Court. Subsequently, the Family Court enhanced child maintenance to Rs.50,000 per child per month from April 2024, which the wife challenged, seeking further enhancement. During the pendency of the appeal, the wife was diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer, and the High Court directed interim maintenance of Rs.20,000 per month for her medical needs. The High Court finally disposed of the appeal, enhancing child maintenance to Rs.1,25,000 per month for both children, but omitted the interim maintenance for the wife in its final order. The wife appealed to the Supreme Court, contending that the children's actual expenses exceeded Rs.1,66,847 per month, that the husband's voluntary deductions like Provident Fund and Employee Stock Purchase Plans should not reduce his income for maintenance calculation, and that her medical condition necessitated continued and enhanced maintenance. The Supreme Court examined the husband's income, noting that after voluntary deductions, his net income was lower, but held that PF and ESPP are benefits accruing to the husband and cannot be treated as compulsory deductions. It emphasized that children must receive maintenance commensurate with the parents' standard of living. Accordingly, the Court enhanced child maintenance to Rs.1,50,000 per month (Rs.75,000 per child) effective from 1st January 2025. It also enhanced the wife's interim maintenance to Rs.30,000 per month, considering her medical expenses. The Court directed compliance within three months, including clearing arrears, and noted the husband's undertaking regarding transfer of a vehicle. The appeals were disposed of with these modifications.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Child Maintenance - Standard of Living - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Sections 24, 26 - The maintenance for minor children must be fixed keeping in view the standard of living of the parents and the actual expenses incurred on education, extracurricular activities, and other needs. Held, that the children are entitled to the same facilities enjoyed by their parents, and the court enhanced the maintenance to Rs.1,50,000 per month for both children (Rs.75,000 per child) effective from 1st January 2025. (Paras 14, 19, 23)

B) Family Law - Maintenance - Determination of Income - Voluntary Deductions - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Sections 24, 26 - Deductions from the husband's salary such as Provident Fund and Employee Stock Purchase Plans (ESPP) are not permanent charges but benefits that accrue to the husband, unlike income tax or professional taxes, which are mandatory. Such voluntary deductions cannot be treated as compulsory deductions to reduce the net income available for maintenance calculation. (Paras 19, 20)

C) Family Law - Interim Maintenance - Medical Needs of Wife - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 24 - The wife was diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer, and the High Court had initially directed interim maintenance of Rs.20,000 per month. The Supreme Court noted that the final order omitted this maintenance and enhanced it to Rs.30,000 per month, considering her medical expenses and that she is caring for the children. (Paras 12, 21, 22)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court correctly enhanced child maintenance to Rs.1,25,000 per month; Whether voluntary deductions can be treated as compulsory to reduce income for maintenance; Whether interim maintenance for wife's medical expenses should be continued and enhanced

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, enhancing child maintenance to Rs.1,50,000/- per month (Rs.75,000 per child) effective from January 1, 2025; and enhanced the wife's interim maintenance to Rs.30,000/- per month for medical expenses. The Court also held that voluntary deductions like PF and ESPP cannot be treated as compulsory deductions to reduce income. The Court directed the respondent-husband to comply with the undertaking regarding vehicle transfer and clear arrears within three months.

Law Points

  • Maintenance under Section 24 and 26 of Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • child maintenance should correspond to parents' standard of living
  • voluntary deductions like Provident Fund and Employee Stock Purchase Plans cannot reduce net income for maintenance
  • interim maintenance for medical needs of spouse is permissible
  • reasonable approximation in maintenance estimation
  • standard of living of children must be maintained
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (SC) (08) 30

Civil Appeal Nos. of 2026 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 31815-31816 of 2025)

2026-08-10

Sanjay Karol, Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

2026 INSC 822

Harpreet Sawhney

Puneet Sharma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal arising out of matrimonial dispute concerning interim maintenance for children and wife under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Remedy Sought

The appellant-wife sought enhancement of child maintenance and continuation of interim medical maintenance, while also seeking directions regarding arrears and ownership of a vehicle.

Filing Reason

The appellant-wife challenged the High Court's order dated 14.08.2025, which she claimed insufficiently enhanced child maintenance and did not address interim maintenance for her medical condition.

Previous Decisions

The Family Court initially awarded Rs.37,000 per child per month (later enhanced to Rs.40,000) and then Rs.50,000 per child per month. The High Court enhanced it to Rs.1,25,000 total per month for both children and granted Rs.20,000 per month interim maintenance for the wife, which was later not continued in the final order. The Supreme Court further modified the amounts.

Issues

Whether the High Court correctly assessed the quantum of child maintenance considering the children's expenses and the husband's income Whether voluntary deductions such as Provident Fund and ESPP should be excluded from the husband's income for maintenance purposes Whether the wife is entitled to interim maintenance for her medical treatment despite the High Court's omission in the final order

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that the combined monthly expenses of children amount to Rs.1,66,847/-, which the High Court ignored; Voluntary deductions like ESPP and PF are not compulsory and should not reduce the husband's monthly income for maintenance calculation; The wife's aggressive breast cancer has impacted her ability to cover the shortfall, necessitating enhancement of interim maintenance.

Ratio Decidendi

For determining maintenance under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, voluntary deductions such as Provident Fund and Employee Stock Purchase Plans, which ultimately benefit the contributor, cannot be treated as compulsory deductions to reduce the net income available for maintenance. The maintenance for children must correspond to the standard of living of the parents, and the wife's medical needs can be considered for interim maintenance.

Judgment Excerpts

We find that deductions of Provident Fund and ESPPs are ultimately benefits that would be passed on to the Respondent - husband . Unlike Income Tax payment or professional taxes which are mandatory t axes, PFs and ESPPs are not permanent charges but rather will accrue into the account of the Respondent - husband which can be withdrawn by the deposit o r in the future. (Para 20) We accordingly enhance monthly maintenance for both children to a total of Rs. 1,50,000/ - (Rs. 75,000/ - per child) with effective from 1 st January 2025. (Para 23) We find it fit to enhance the maintenance to Rs. 30,000/ - per month , particularly keeping in mind the medical expenses. (Para 22)

Procedural History

The parties married on 09.12.2004 and had two sons. The husband left the family home on 21.06.2018. The wife filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, along with an application under Sections 24 and 26 seeking interim maintenance on 17.09.2019. The Family Court on 08.01.2021 granted child maintenance but denied maintenance to the wife. The High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against this order on 23.03.2021. The wife sought enhancement, and the Family Court on 12.07.2024 enhanced child maintenance to Rs.50,000 per child per month. The wife challenged this before the High Court. During pendency, the wife was diagnosed with breast cancer, and the High Court on 10.12.2024 directed interim maintenance of Rs.20,000 per month for the wife. The High Court on 14.08.2025 enhanced child maintenance to Rs.1,25,000 per month but omitted the wife's interim maintenance, and closed contempt proceedings. A clarification order on 02.09.2025 granted six months to clear arrears but did not address other clarifications. The wife appealed to the Supreme Court, which delivered the present judgment on 10.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 13(1)(ia), 24, 26
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 151
  • Constitution of India: 136
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance to Wife in Matrimonial Dispute. Voluntary Deductions Like Provident Fund and Employee Stock Purchase Plans Cannot Reduce Monthly Income for Maintenance Purposes Under Sec...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Appeal Against Single Judge's Refusal of Interim Injunction in 'Netromycin' v. 'Netmicin' Trade Mark Dispute. The appeal challenges the finding that the marks are not deceptively similar and that surrounding cir...