KAHC010000842011_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and connected matters. The petitioners, being several individuals including R. Shankaran, Dharma Narayana, Lakshmana, Umadevi, and others, challenged the acquisition of their lands by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) for the formation of a layout called Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The BDA issued a preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (or under Section 17(1) and (3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976) and a final notification dated 18.02.2010 under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act. The petitioners sought quashing of these notifications invoking Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, contending that the acquisition was illegal and praying for relief. The respondents were the State of Karnataka through its Urban Development Department, the Commissioner of BDA, and the Land Acquisition Officers. The case was heard by Justice Anand Byrareddy and judgment was pronounced on 11 July 2014. The complete text of the judgment was not provided in the extract, thus the court's reasoning, decision, and directions are not available.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010000842011_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 31

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and connected matters

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, Agnihotri Associates for petitioners; D. Nagaraj, Additional Government Advocate for State; Jayakumar S Patil, Senior Advocate for A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar for BDA

R. Shankaran, Dharma Narayana, Lakshmana, Umadevi, G. Siddalingaswamy, K.G. Gurushantha, Krishnappa, Nagarathna G., Syed Ashraf, V. Thimmaiah, Deepa Salunki, Sumathi Sadashiva, V. Krishnamurthy, Thulasamma, Shivamma, Rathnamma, N. Krishnappa and others

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority; Senior Land Acquisition Officer, BDA; Special Land Acquisition Officer, BDA; Land Acquisition Officer, BDA

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 and final notification dated 18.02.2010

Filing Reason

Land acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010000842011_1
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.