High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 74
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Whether the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act / Section 17 of BDA Act and final notification dated 18.2.2010 are valid

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Land acquisition
  • preliminary notification
  • final notification
  • BDA Act 1976
  • Land Acquisition Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 21

W.P. No. 32186/2010 and connected matters

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B. for petitioner; D. Nagaraj, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.1; Jayakumar S Patil, Senior Advocate for A. Lokanath for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3

Sri. R. Shankaran and others

State of Karnataka, Bangalore Development Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to land acquisition notifications

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary and final notifications

Filing Reason

Acquisition of land for formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Installation of Musical Fountain and Viewer's Gallery in Futala Tank Subject to Environmental Compliance and Restoration of Lake to Original State. The court directed that the project may proceed but must comply with all envi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Transfer Petitions in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act — Jurisdictional Dispute Between Kolkata and Bhopal Courts. Court Examines Pre and Post Amendment Legal Principles to Determine Proper Forum for Trial.