Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-17 06:03:03
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Whether the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act / Section 17 of BDA Act and final notification dated 18.2.2010 are valid

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Land acquisition
  • preliminary notification
  • final notification
  • BDA Act 1976
  • Land Acquisition Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 21

W.P. No. 32186/2010 and connected matters

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B. for petitioner; D. Nagaraj, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.1; Jayakumar S Patil, Senior Advocate for A. Lokanath for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3

Sri. R. Shankaran and others

State of Karnataka, Bangalore Development Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to land acquisition notifications

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary and final notifications

Filing Reason

Acquisition of land for formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition preliminary notification final notification Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout BDA Act writ petition

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Town Planning Compensation Dispute — Finality of Town Planning Officer's Decision Affirmed. The court upheld the finality of the Town Planning Officer's decision on compensation under the Bombay Town Plannin... 2026-11-01 02:25:58
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Accused in Criminal Procedure Code Case Challenging Magistrate's Suo Motu Further Investigation Order - Sets Aside Magistrate's Direction and Directs Proceeding on Existing Materials. Judicial Magistrate Lacks Power to Order Furt... 2026-11-01 02:25:56
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?