Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposed of Batch Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout at Bangalore. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-15 09:38:14
  • 89
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010687822011_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 25

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and connected writ petitions

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Shri. Udaykumar H.B., Shri. D.L. Jagadeesh, Shri. A. Nagarajappa, Shri. G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates, Shri. D. Nagaraj, Additional Government Advocate, Shri. Jayakumar S Patil, Senior Advocate

Sri. R. Shankaran and Others

State of Karnataka, Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition notifications.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued by BDA for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Filing Reason

Petitioners' lands were acquired without proper procedure or objections.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 17(1) and (3), Section 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition BDA preliminary notification final notification writ petition Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Articles 226 and 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Property Suit — Balance of Convenience Favors Plaintiff. The court upheld the trial court's order granting interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, finding no perve... 2026-09-17 08:53:51
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Termination for Failure to Pass Tamil Language Test and Directs Regularization of Temporary Employee's Service. Passing Language Test While in Temporary Service Satisfies Regularization Condition, and Cancellation ... 2026-09-17 08:53:45
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition natural justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?