Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposed of Batch Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout at Bangalore. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-13 14:22:54
  • 99
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010687822011_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 25

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and connected writ petitions

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Shri. Udaykumar H.B., Shri. D.L. Jagadeesh, Shri. A. Nagarajappa, Shri. G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates, Shri. D. Nagaraj, Additional Government Advocate, Shri. Jayakumar S Patil, Senior Advocate

Sri. R. Shankaran and Others

State of Karnataka, Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition notifications.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued by BDA for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Filing Reason

Petitioners' lands were acquired without proper procedure or objections.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 17(1) and (3), Section 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition BDA preliminary notification final notification writ petition Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Articles 226 and 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Order on Arbitration Award — Legal Misconduct Found. Legal Misconduct Found as Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction and Failed to Consider Contractual Obligations Under Section 30 of the Arbitration A... 2026-11-01 19:34:52
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Public Sector Undertaking in Central Excise Duty Dispute — Clarifies Transaction Value Definition. 2026-11-01 19:34:47
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation Jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?