Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates batch of writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions challenge preliminary notification under Section 17(1)(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and final notification under Section 19(1), alleging procedural lapses in the formation of the layout.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-02 19:08:16
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010886552010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 28

WRIT PETITION No. 32186 OF 2010 c/w connected writ petitions

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, Agnihotri Associates, D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil, A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar

R. Shankaran, Dharma Narayana, Lakshmana, Umadevi, G. Siddalingaswamy, K.G. Gurushantha, Krishnappa, Nagarathna G, Syed Ashraf, V. Thimmaiah, Deepa Salunki, Sumathi Sadashiva, V. Krishnamurthy, Thulasamma, Shivamma, Rathnamma, N. Krishnappa and others

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department, Bangalore Development Authority, and Land Acquisition Officers

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to land acquisition notifications for formation of residential layout.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seeking quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 for acquisition of their lands.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegality in the acquisition process under BDA Act and Land Acquisition Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition Bangalore Development Authority Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout preliminary notification final notification writ petition BDA Act Land Acquisition Act

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka adjudicates batch of writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions challenge preliminary notification under Section 17(1)(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Ac... 2026-08-02 19:08:16
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Revenue's Challenge Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Service Tax Demand on Oil Companies for CNG Sale. Dispute Concerns Classification of CNG Sale by BPCL and HPCL as Business Auxiliary Service under Section 65(19) of Finance Ac... 2026-08-02 19:08:16
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Acquittal natural justice murder compensation Burden of Proof Benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?