Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates batch of writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions challenge preliminary notification under Section 17(1)(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and final notification under Section 19(1), alleging procedural lapses in the formation of the layout.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-21 14:43:48
  • 117
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010886552010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 28

WRIT PETITION No. 32186 OF 2010 c/w connected writ petitions

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, Agnihotri Associates, D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil, A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar

R. Shankaran, Dharma Narayana, Lakshmana, Umadevi, G. Siddalingaswamy, K.G. Gurushantha, Krishnappa, Nagarathna G, Syed Ashraf, V. Thimmaiah, Deepa Salunki, Sumathi Sadashiva, V. Krishnamurthy, Thulasamma, Shivamma, Rathnamma, N. Krishnappa and others

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department, Bangalore Development Authority, and Land Acquisition Officers

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to land acquisition notifications for formation of residential layout.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seeking quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 for acquisition of their lands.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegality in the acquisition process under BDA Act and Land Acquisition Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition Bangalore Development Authority Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout preliminary notification final notification writ petition BDA Act Land Acquisition Act

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employee's Right to Enhanced Retirement Age in AYUSH Sector — Clarifies Applicability of Fundamental Rules. 2026-11-01 04:13:37
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State's Appeal in POTA Case — Evidence Admissibility Issues Addressed. 2026-11-01 04:13:36
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?