Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates batch of writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions challenge preliminary notification under Section 17(1)(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and final notification under Section 19(1), alleging procedural lapses in the formation of the layout.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-24 02:38:56
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010886552010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 28

WRIT PETITION No. 32186 OF 2010 c/w connected writ petitions

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, Agnihotri Associates, D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil, A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar

R. Shankaran, Dharma Narayana, Lakshmana, Umadevi, G. Siddalingaswamy, K.G. Gurushantha, Krishnappa, Nagarathna G, Syed Ashraf, V. Thimmaiah, Deepa Salunki, Sumathi Sadashiva, V. Krishnamurthy, Thulasamma, Shivamma, Rathnamma, N. Krishnappa and others

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department, Bangalore Development Authority, and Land Acquisition Officers

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to land acquisition notifications for formation of residential layout.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seeking quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 for acquisition of their lands.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegality in the acquisition process under BDA Act and Land Acquisition Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition Bangalore Development Authority Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout preliminary notification final notification writ petition BDA Act Land Acquisition Act

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Entertainment Expenditure Dispute; Ordinary Meals as Business Necessity Not Covered Under Section 37(2A) Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court Holds That Expenditure on Provision of Ordinary Meals to Cu... 2026-09-17 01:59:22
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Power Trust's Appeal Against CIRP Initiation for Appellant(s), Upholds NCLAT Order Admitting Section 7 IBC Application Due to Default and Non-Compliance with Restructuring Conditions 2026-09-17 01:59:21
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?