High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and/or Sections 17(1) and 17(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, and the final notification dated 18.02.2010 issued under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act, pertaining to the acquisition of lands for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitioners, being several landowners, contested the acquisition by the Bangalore Development Authority. The respondents were the State of Karnataka through its Urban Development Department and the BDA officials. The matter was heard by Justice Anand Byrareddy on 11.07.2014. The court's detailed reasoning and final decision are not contained in the provided text excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010914932010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 29

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 (connected with numerous other writ petitions)

2014-07-11

Justice Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates, D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil, A. Lokanath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar, I.G. Gachchinamath

Sri. R. Shankaran and other petitioners in connected writ petitions

State of Karnataka through its Secretary, Urban Development Department; Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority; Land Acquisition Officer, BDA

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging land acquisition notifications.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 and final notification dated 18.02.2010 for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Filing Reason

Acquisition of land for layout development by BDA.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and/or Sections 17(1) and 17(3) of the BDA Act and the final notification dated 18.02.2010 under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act. The petitions were heard together by the High Court on 11.07.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Remand Order in Cooperative Society Membership Dispute — Divisional Joint Registrar's Remand Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. The court held that the Deputy Registrar's order under Section 22(2) of t...