High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 Are Impugned.
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "regulated water supply"
206 result(s) found
Found 206 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; HSR Layout Scheme Fully Implemented, Acquisition Completed. Appellant's Claim for Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Rejected as Possession Taken and Third-Party Rights Created.
1 Dec 2020The litigation arose from the acquisition of 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 146 of Agara Village for the formation of HSR Layout by the Bengaluru Develo...
- 48
High Court
- 44
High Court
- 153
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Reviews Challenge to CRZ-II Reclassification of Coastal Stretches in Dona Paula and Surrounding Areas. Petitioners Allege Reclassification from CRZ-III to CRZ-II Undermines Environmental Protection and Serves Hotel and Builder Lobbies, Affecting Green Cover and Ecology.
10 Dec 2010The matter concerns a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by two residents of La Oceana Colony, Dona Paula, Goa, agains...
- 44
High Court
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.
17 Oct 2005The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.
29 Sep 2022The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.
17 Oct 2005The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...
- 246
High Court
- 83
