Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010259352010_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-02 16:41:33
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010259352010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 48

W.P. No. 32186/2010 and connected matters

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

For Petitioners: Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates; For Respondents: D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil

Sri. R. Shankaran and others

The State of Karnataka, The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority, The Land Acquisition Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act and/or Sections 17(1),(3) and final notification under Section 19(1) of BDA Act

Filing Reason

Landowners aggrieved by acquisition of their lands

Procedural History

Various writ petitions filed in 2010 and later challenging preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act for lands in Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions were connected and heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition preliminary notification final notification writ petition Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Bangalore Development Authority

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Av... 2026-08-02 16:41:33
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Hears Appeals Against Specific Performance Decree in Agricultural Land Sale Agreement Dispute. The dispute involved claims of tampering, cancellation of agreement, and subsequent sales to third parties. 2026-08-02 16:41:33
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation Burden of Proof benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?