Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010259352010_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-31 15:21:51
  • 289
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010259352010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 48

W.P. No. 32186/2010 and connected matters

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

For Petitioners: Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates; For Respondents: D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil

Sri. R. Shankaran and others

The State of Karnataka, The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority, The Land Acquisition Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act and/or Sections 17(1),(3) and final notification under Section 19(1) of BDA Act

Filing Reason

Landowners aggrieved by acquisition of their lands

Procedural History

Various writ petitions filed in 2010 and later challenging preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act for lands in Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions were connected and heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition preliminary notification final notification writ petition Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Bangalore Development Authority

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Land Acquisition Proceedings — Upholds Government's Right to Acquire Land. The court confirmed that all legal procedures for land acquisition were followed, and possession was validly taken under the Land Acq... 2026-10-31 21:18:49
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Application for Building Stone (M-Sand) — Directs Reconsideration. The Court held that rejection based on distance from a reserved forest was unsustainable as the fo... 2026-10-31 21:18:47
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder natural justice acquittal Compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?