Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010259352010_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-13 13:54:21
  • 279
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010259352010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 48

W.P. No. 32186/2010 and connected matters

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

For Petitioners: Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates; For Respondents: D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil

Sri. R. Shankaran and others

The State of Karnataka, The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority, The Land Acquisition Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act and/or Sections 17(1),(3) and final notification under Section 19(1) of BDA Act

Filing Reason

Landowners aggrieved by acquisition of their lands

Procedural History

Various writ petitions filed in 2010 and later challenging preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act for lands in Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions were connected and heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition preliminary notification final notification writ petition Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Bangalore Development Authority

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Election Petition on Technical Grounds Due to Absence of Mandatory Affidavit for Corrupt Practice Allegations. The High Court had allowed dismissal application under Section 86(1) of Representation of People Act, 1951, finding... 2026-09-16 18:32:51
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Land Tribunal Order Confirming Occupancy Rights Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Landlord's Claim of Tenancy Not Established as Tenant Was in Possession Prior to 1974 Cut-off Date. 2026-09-16 18:32:47
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?