Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 Under Section 17(1) and (3) of BDA Act and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Under Section 19(1).

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-21 06:54:29
  • 113
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010346092010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 14

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and connected matters

2014-07-11

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy

Shri. Udaykumar H.B., Shri. D.L. Jagadeesh, Shri. A. Nagarajappa, Shri. G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates, Shri. D. Nagaraj, Additional Government Advocate, Shri. Jayakumar S Patil, Senior Advocate, Shri. A. Lokanath, Shri. I.G. Gachchinamath, Shri. P.S. Dinesh Kumar

Sri. R. Shankaran and Others

1. The State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; 2. The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority; 3. The Senior Land Acquisition Officer/Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore Development Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

The litigation involves writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued for acquisition of lands for the formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by Bangalore Development Authority.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and the final notification dated 18.2.2010 in respect of their respective lands.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' lands were notified for acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act for the layout and they challenged the legality of the notifications.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 17(1), Section 17(3), Section 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition preliminary notification final notification BDA layout Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout writ petition quashing Articles 226 and 227 Bangalore Development Authority

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Legal Heir to Be Brought on Record in Final Decree Proceedings Without Setting Aside Abatement. Final Decree Proceedings Are Execution Proceedings; Order 22 Rules 3, 4, 8 CPC Not Applicable. 2026-11-01 03:46:35
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Other Driver — Deceased Driver's Claim Not Barred by Own Negligence as Contributory Negligence Not Established. The court held that the Tribunal erred in rejecting t... 2026-11-01 03:46:29
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?