Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition by Bangalore Development Authority for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-31 17:30:38
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010333742010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 12

W.P. No. 32186 of 2010 c/w batch

2014-07-11

Justice Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates, D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil

Sri. R. Shankaran and Others

State of Karnataka and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to land acquisition proceedings for formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by Bangalore Development Authority

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued for acquisition of their lands

Filing Reason

Lands were notified for acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout, and petitioners challenged the validity of notifications

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition preliminary notification final notification BDA Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout writ petition quashing

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Mamlatdar Court's Act for Non-Compliance with Affidavit Requirement. Application for Right of Way Dismissed as Plaint Not Supported by Affidavit as Mandated by Section 5 of Mamlatdar Court's Act, 1906. 2026-11-01 02:39:53
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company and Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Evidence of Mens Rea and Vicarious Liability. Court holds that mere issuance of cheque by a company employee without authorization or kn... 2026-11-01 02:39:51
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?