Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 Are Impugned.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-12 08:34:27
  • 117
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010306812010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 53

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and connected cases

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s Agnihotri Associates (for petitioners); D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil, A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar (for respondents)

Sri. R. Shankaran and others

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; Bangalore Development Authority; Special Land Acquisition Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging land acquisition notifications for the formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 (where applicable) in respect of petitioners' lands.

Filing Reason

Acquisition of petitioners' lands without proper authority or procedure.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Sections 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout preliminary notification final notification BDA writ petition

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Election Petition on Technical Grounds Due to Absence of Mandatory Affidavit for Corrupt Practice Allegations. The High Court had allowed dismissal application under Section 86(1) of Representation of People Act, 1951, finding... 2026-09-16 18:32:51
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Land Tribunal Order Confirming Occupancy Rights Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Landlord's Claim of Tenancy Not Established as Tenant Was in Possession Prior to 1974 Cut-off Date. 2026-09-16 18:32:47
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?