Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 Are Impugned.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-02 16:41:26
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010306812010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 53

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and connected cases

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s Agnihotri Associates (for petitioners); D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil, A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar (for respondents)

Sri. R. Shankaran and others

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; Bangalore Development Authority; Special Land Acquisition Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging land acquisition notifications for the formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 (where applicable) in respect of petitioners' lands.

Filing Reason

Acquisition of petitioners' lands without proper authority or procedure.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Sections 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout preliminary notification final notification BDA writ petition

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Power to Reappreciate Evidence in Domestic Enquiry. Evidence Adduced Before Labour Court Prevails Over Enquiry Findings Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. 2026-08-02 16:41:27
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 Are Impugned. 2026-08-02 16:41:26
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation Burden of Proof benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?