Search Results for "Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules"

485 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 485 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stay on Appointment of Special Auditor Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Order under Section 81(3)(c) for Test Audit Held Administrative, Not Quasi-Judicial, Hence Revision Under Section 154 Not Maintainable.

The petitioners, complainants, sought a test audit of respondent No.6 society under Section 81(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Deemed Membership of Assignee. Transfer of Leasehold Interest Valid Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Sections 22, 23, 24.

The petitioner, The New India Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged concurrent orders of the Divisional Joint Registrar and Deputy Registrar un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Election Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, a Non-Member of the Federation and Its Member Societies, Cannot Challenge Election of Directors Under Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001.

The petitioner, Madhav Atmaram Sahakari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Challenge to Transfer of Shares and Membership. Transfer of shares by builder to flat purchasers held valid under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and Bye-laws.

The petitioner, R.N.A. Classic CHS Ltd, a cooperative housing society, filed four writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Deputy Registrar and...