Case Note & Summary
The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the order of the Minister under Section 152 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, which had quashed the bifurcation of a parent cooperative society into separate societies for residential and commercial buildings. The parent society, registered in 1960, had about 2000 members and owned 19 residential buildings and one commercial building at Lamington Road, as well as buildings at Chembur and Matunga. Due to disputes, the petitioner, representing the commercial building occupants, sought bifurcation under Section 18 of the MCS Act. The Divisional Joint Registrar, after following due process including a draft order and consideration of objections, passed a final order in 1996 dividing the parent society into four separate societies: one for residential buildings at Lamington Road, one for the commercial building at Lamington Road, and separate societies for Chembur and Matunga. The parent society appealed to the Minister, who allowed the appeal and set aside the bifurcation specifically for the commercial and residential buildings at Lamington Road, while upholding the other bifurcations. The petitioner, the society for the commercial building, challenged this order. The court found that the Minister's order was based on two erroneous grounds: first, that there was no consultation with the federal society, but the court noted that no federal society had been constituted and notified under Section 18, and the Deputy Registrar had forwarded the draft to the Bombay District Housing Federation which did not respond; second, that objections from members were not properly called, but the record showed that the parent society had issued a circular and the Divisional Joint Registrar had considered all objections. Additionally, the court emphasized that the bifurcated societies had been functioning independently for nearly thirty years, with separate management and financial arrangements, and that the Minister's order would cause disruption. The court also noted that the parent society had earlier expressed a desire for separate societies. Relying on precedents, the court held that the Minister's order was unsustainable and quashed it, restoring the Divisional Joint Registrar's bifurcation order.
Headnote
A) Cooperative Societies - Bifurcation of Society - Section 18 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Requirement of Consultation with Federal Society - The court held that since no federal society was constituted and notified by the State Government in the official gazette as required under Section 18, there was no question of consultation with a non-existent federal society. The Deputy Registrar had forwarded the draft order to the Bombay District Housing Federation, but it failed to submit any opinion. The Minister's reliance on lack of consultation was erroneous. (Paras 9, 15-16) B) Cooperative Societies - Bifurcation of Society - Section 18 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Calling for Objections - The court noted that the Deputy Registrar had forwarded the draft order to the parent society, which issued a circular to members for objections. The Divisional Joint Registrar considered all objections before passing the final order. The Minister's finding that objections were not properly called was not supported by evidence. (Paras 10, 15-16) C) Cooperative Societies - Bifurcation of Society - Section 18 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Long-Standing Functioning as Independent Societies - The court observed that the bifurcated societies had been functioning independently for almost thirty years, with separate management and affairs. The impugned order cancelling bifurcation at this stage would cause disruption and was not in the interest of the members. (Paras 12, 17-18)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the Minister's appellate order under Section 152 of the MCS Act quashing the bifurcation of the parent society into separate societies for commercial and residential buildings was valid and sustainable.
Final Decision
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the Minister's order dated 27th March 1997, and restored the Divisional Joint Registrar's order of bifurcation under Section 18 of the MCS Act.
Law Points
- Bifurcation of cooperative society under Section 18 of MCS Act
- requirement of consultation with federal society
- necessity of objections from members
- functioning of bifurcated societies for long period as independent entities



