Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Steps. Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked where respondent failed to appoint arbitrator within 30 days of notice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and the respondent, a multi-state co-operative society constituted under the Multi State Cooperative Society Act, 2002, entered into an agreement containing an arbitration clause. Disputes arose between the parties, and the appellant issued a notice invoking arbitration on 10th July 2026, calling upon the respondent to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement. The respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days of the notice. The appellant then filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The court considered the submissions of both parties. The appellant argued that the respondent's failure to appoint an arbitrator within the stipulated time entitled the appellant to approach the court. The respondent contended that the pre-arbitration steps, including mutual consultation, were not complied with. The court held that the appellant had substantially complied with the pre-arbitration steps by sending a notice of dispute and waiting for a reasonable period. The respondent's failure to respond and appoint an arbitrator constituted a failure to act under the arbitration agreement. The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The judgment was pronounced on 17th July 2026.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Failure to Appoint - The appellant issued a notice invoking arbitration and called upon the respondent to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement. The respondent did not appoint an arbitrator within 30 days. The court held that the respondent's failure to act entitled the appellant to approach the court under Section 11(6) for appointment of an arbitrator. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes. (Paras 1-4)

B) Arbitration Law - Pre-Arbitration Steps - Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Compliance - The arbitration agreement required the parties to attempt settlement through mutual consultation before arbitration. The appellant sent a notice of dispute and waited for a reasonable period. The court found that the pre-arbitration steps were substantially complied with, and the respondent's failure to respond justified the invocation of Section 11(6). (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, when the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days of the notice invoking arbitration, despite the arbitration agreement providing for a specific procedure.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

Law Points

  • Arbitration agreement
  • appointment of arbitrator
  • failure to act
  • Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • pre-arbitration steps
  • notice invoking arbitration
  • deemed failure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 32

Civil Revision Application No. 300 of 2026

2026-07-17

Arun R. Pedneker, J.

Mr. Rohan Cama a/w Mr. Aseem Naphade, Mr. Aman Sadiwala & Mr. Kush Shah i/b Mr. Vikrant D. Shetty, for the Applicant. Mr. Mahesh Menon a/w Ms. Aakansha Anand & Ms. Vaishali Chhabra i/b Mahesh Menon & Co., for the Respondent.

Saidpur Jute Company Limited

National Co-operative Consumers' Federation of India Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Revision Application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought appointment of an arbitrator by the court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Filing Reason

The respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days of the notice invoking arbitration issued by the appellant.

Issues

Whether the appellant complied with the pre-arbitration steps as per the arbitration agreement? Whether the respondent's failure to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days entitles the appellant to seek appointment under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant submitted that it issued a notice invoking arbitration on 10th July 2026, calling upon the respondent to appoint an arbitrator, but the respondent failed to do so within 30 days. The respondent argued that the pre-arbitration steps, including mutual consultation, were not complied with, and therefore the application under Section 11(6) was not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

Where an arbitration agreement provides for a procedure for appointment of an arbitrator and a party fails to act as required under that procedure, the other party may approach the court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator. Substantial compliance with pre-arbitration steps is sufficient.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant issued a notice invoking arbitration on 10th July 2026, calling upon the respondent to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement. The respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days of the notice. The court held that the respondent's failure to act entitled the appellant to approach the court under Section 11(6) for appointment of an arbitrator.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on 10th July 2026. The court reserved orders on 10th July 2026 and pronounced the judgment on 17th July 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11(6)
  • Companies Act, 1956:
  • Multi State Cooperative Society Act, 2002:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Steps. Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked where respondent failed to ap...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Exemption from Personal Appearance for Accused Director in CBI Case Due to Business Hardship. Section 205 CrPC Discretion Exercised to Balance Trial Progress and Accused's Convenience.