Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Registration of New Cooperative Society Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — No Violation of Natural Justice Found as Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice. The Court held that even if there was a breach of natural justice, the petitioner must demonstrate prejudice, which was not done.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 109
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Hiradgaon Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd., an existing cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging the registration of respondent No.4, Nagnath Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd., under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner alleged that the registration was granted without giving it an opportunity of being heard, violating principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, opposed the petition. The court examined the provisions of the Act and found that there was no statutory requirement for hearing the petitioner before registration. Even assuming a breach of natural justice, the court held that the petitioner must show prejudice, which it failed to do. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Registration of Society - Natural Justice - Section 9, Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Petitioner challenged registration of a new cooperative society on the ground that it was granted without hearing the petitioner, who was an existing society in the same area. The Court held that even if there was a breach of natural justice, the petitioner must show prejudice. Since the petitioner failed to demonstrate any prejudice caused by the non-hearing, the writ petition was dismissed. (Paras 5-6)

B) Cooperative Law - Registration of Society - Prejudice - Section 12, Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The Court observed that the petitioner did not have a right to be heard under Section 9 of the Act, and even assuming a right existed, the petitioner did not show how the registration of respondent No.4 affected its interests. The petition was dismissed as devoid of merit. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the registration of respondent No.4 society was illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice, and whether the petitioner was entitled to be heard before such registration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Prejudice requirement
  • Registration of cooperative society
  • Section 9 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Section 12 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (10) 13

Writ Petition No.9628 of 2012

0000-00-00

Mr V.D.Hon for petitioner, Mr V.D.Rakh for respondents 1 to 3, Mr N.V.Gavare for respondent No.4

Hiradgaon Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd.

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging registration of a cooperative society.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of registration of respondent No.4 society.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that registration was granted without hearing it, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the registration of respondent No.4 society was illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice? Whether the petitioner was entitled to be heard before registration of respondent No.4 society?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that registration was granted without giving it an opportunity of being heard, violating natural justice. Respondents argued that there was no statutory requirement for hearing the petitioner and that the petitioner failed to show any prejudice.

Ratio Decidendi

Even if there is a breach of natural justice, the petitioner must show prejudice. Since the petitioner failed to demonstrate any prejudice caused by the non-hearing, the petition was dismissed.

Judgment Excerpts

Even if there is any breach of principles of natural justice, the petitioner must show that prejudice is caused to it. The petitioner has not pointed out any prejudice caused to it.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 9, Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Registration of New Cooperative Society Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — No Violation of Natural Justice Found as Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice. The Court held that even...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse o...