Search Results for "tripartite development agreement"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Return of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit, Holds Dispute Falls Within Commercial Dispute Definition. Agreement for Development of Land Involves Commercial Activity Under Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

The petitioner, original defendant no.3(a) to 3(c) in a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 1st October 2014, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Dispute involves multiple hotel management agreements and the applicability of arbitration clauses after partial setting aside of a prior award.

The dispute arises from a series of hotel management agreements concerning a hotel at Lonavala owned by petitioner Laguna Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (formerly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Deemed Conveyance Order Under MOFA as Bifurcation Under MCS Act Already Vests Land. Section 17(2) of MCS Act Operates as Automatic Conveyance, Precluding Jurisdiction Under Section 11(3) of MOFA.

The dispute arose from a bifurcation of a co-operative housing society and a subsequent claim for deemed conveyance. The original society, Happy Homes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Measures in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act, Citing Public Interest in Airport Development. Termination of Determinable Contract Not Stayed as Injunction Would Amount to Specific Performance Barred Under Specific Relief Act.

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015

The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...