High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) against B.R. Films, a partnership firm, challenging an arbitral award dated 10th December, 2012. The dispute arose from a Distribution Agreement dated 14th March, 2008, whereby the respondent granted exclusive distribution rights to the petitioner for the Hindi film “Banda Yeh Bindass Hai,” originally titled “Pappu Pass Ho Gaya.” The respondent was producing the film and had obtained financial assistance of Rs. 750 lakhs from IDBI, with a tripartite laboratory agreement involving the petitioner and IDBI. Prior to the agreement, the respondent had corresponded with Twentieth Century Fox, acknowledging that the film was an Indian adaptation of “My Cousin Vinny,” and had offered a token amount. The petitioner paid Rs. 7 crores under the Distribution Agreement. The respondent failed to deliver the film by the agreed delivery date of 30th June, 2008, or within the grace period up to 30th September, 2008. The respondent claimed that the film was shown to an employee of the petitioner in August 2008, but the petitioner denied this. Meanwhile, Twentieth Century Fox sent legal notices alleging plagiarism, and on 13th April, 2009, it filed suit No. 1925 of 2009 against the respondent for copyright infringement. The respondent terminated the Distribution Agreement on 23rd March, 2009, forfeiting the advance, while the petitioner also terminated on 26th March, 2009, seeking refund with interest. The petitioner invoked arbitration on 27th May, 2009. The parties jointly appointed a former Supreme Court judge as sole arbitrator on 29th March, 2010. The petitioner filed a statement of claim on 29th June, 2010, seeking refund of Rs. 9.25 crores (presumably including interest or additional amounts). The arbitral award dated 10th December, 2012 partly allowed the respondent’s claims. The petition in the High Court sought to set aside that award. The judgment, delivered by Justice R.D. Dhanuka on 11th July, 2018, records only the factual background and does not contain the court’s analysis or decision in the provided excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1333 OF 2012

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (07) 68

Arbitration Petition No. 1333 of 2012

2018-07-11

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

2018:BHC-OS:9921

Shiraz Rustomjee, Shreya Parikh, Surja Iyer, Hussain Dolkawala, Shriniket Deshpande, Gaurav Joshi, Dharam Jumani, Mansi Vyas

Reliance Media Works Limited (Formerly known as Adlabs Films Ltd.)

B.R. Films, a partnership firm

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging arbitral award.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks setting aside of the arbitral award dated 10th December, 2012 and refund of amounts paid under the distribution agreement.

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by the arbitral award that partly allowed respondent's claims and disallowed petitioner's claim for refund.

Previous Decisions

Arbitral award dated 10th December, 2012 partly allowing respondent's claims.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award dated 10th December, 2012 passed by the learned arbitrator thereby allowing part of the claims made by the respondent. On 13th April, 2009, the said Twentieth Century Fox filed a suit bearing No.1925 of 2009 against the respondent alleging infringement of their copyright by the respondent in the movie “My Cousin Vinny” and prayed for various reliefs.

Procedural History

On 14th March, 2008, the parties entered into a Distribution Agreement. The respondent failed to deliver the film by the agreed date. On 23rd March, 2009, the respondent terminated the agreement, forfeiting the advance. On 26th March, 2009, the petitioner also terminated, seeking refund. The petitioner invoked arbitration on 27th May, 2009. On 29th March, 2010, a sole arbitrator was appointed jointly by the parties. The petitioner filed its statement of claim on 29th June, 2010, seeking refund of Rs. 9.25 crores. The arbitral award was passed on 10th December, 2012, partly allowing respondent’s claims. The petitioner then filed the present petition under Section 34 in 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 34
  • Indian Companies Act, 1956:
  • Indian Partnership Act, 1932:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Registrar's Order Setting Aside Election of Managing Committee in Co-operative Housing Society for Violation of Bye-Laws. Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societie...