APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahim. The original plaintiff, Shree Vardhaman Stanakvasi Jain Shravak Sangh, a trust, claimed ownership of original plot nos.267, 267A, and 267B. Under the town planning scheme, title of final plot no.267 vested in the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, though a portion of 353 sq.mtrs remained in the plaintiff's possession. The final plot was initially reserved for a municipal school and later for housing for dishoused persons. The plaintiff had given a registered undertaking to hand over the suit property when demanded. Subsequently, the defendant society (occupants of tenements on the plot) appointed a developer, and the Municipal Corporation granted approvals for redevelopment. The plaintiff filed a suit and obtained an interim injunction against the redevelopment. The trial court allowed the plaintiff's notice of motion and dismissed a notice of motion filed by the developer seeking to vacate earlier orders. Aggrieved, the defendants filed the present appeals. The judgment in the provided extract does not contain the court's analysis or final decision; it only sets out the factual background and procedural history up to the filing of the appeals. The appeals were heard together and reserved for judgment.

Issue of Consideration

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (03) 70

Appeal from Order No.495 of 2015 along with Appeal from Order Nos.496, 1210 and 487 of 2015

2016-03-08

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

Mr.Pravin Samdhani, Mr.Anirudha Joshi, Mr.Satyen Vora, Mr.Atul Kshatriya, Mr.E.P. Bharucha, Mr.A.V. Diwate, Mr.T.N. Subramanian, Mr.Shishir Joshi, Ms.Priti Joshi, Mr.Mukesh Chheda

M/s. Ashwatha Developers, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Assistant Municipal Commissioner 'G' North Ward, Dadar Saiprasad Co-operative Housing Society Limited

Shree Vardhaman Stanakvasi Jain Shravak Sangh and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against order granting interim injunction in suit concerning ownership and development of land under town planning scheme.

Remedy Sought

The appellants seek to set aside the trial court's order allowing the plaintiff's notice of motion for interim relief and dismissing defendant no.4's notice of motion.

Filing Reason

The trial court granted interim relief to plaintiff, restraining defendants from proceeding with redevelopment of final plot no.267.

Previous Decisions

The trial court allowed Notice of Motion No.1396 of 2010 filed by plaintiff and dismissed Notice of Motion No.3339 of 2013 filed by defendant no.4.

Judgment Excerpts

On coming into force of TPS, title of final plot no.267 vested in the defendant no.1 (Municipal Corporation), the Planning Authority under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Clause (u) of the said IOD provided for a registered undertaking to be filed by the plaintiff stating that an area of open plot at present in possession of the plaintiff shall be handed over to the Municipal Corporation when required and such registered undertaking shall be submitted to the office of Municipal Corporation. It is the case of the defendants that if the plaintiff would not have accepted the condition of IOD, building plan submitted by the plaintiff for development of final plot no.265 or for construction thereon would not have been sanctioned and/or approved.

Procedural History

Plaintiff filed suit and took out Notice of Motion No.1396 of 2010 seeking interim relief. Defendant no.4 filed Notice of Motion No.3339 of 2013 seeking vacation of earlier orders dated 16 June 2010 and 19 October 2010. By order dated 30 January 2015, the trial court allowed plaintiff's notice of motion and dismissed defendant no.4's notice of motion. The defendants filed four appeals against that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915: Section 9
  • Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954:
  • Bombay Town Planning Scheme Validation Act, 1956:
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 88
  • Development Control Regulations, 1991: Regulation 33(7)
  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SARFAESI Auction Case, Reinstating DRT Order and Sale. High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Improper When Statutory Remedy Available; Auction Deposit Complied with Rules and Property Not Exempt as Agricultural Land Under Sec...
Related Judgement
High Court APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015