KAHC010000842011_1...
The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and connected matters. The petitioners, being several...
High Court
Sort by:
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area....
The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...
- 111
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA....
A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisi...
- 119
High Court
- 118
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Son of Vehicle Owner Held to be Employee. Relationship of employer and employee established despite family ownership; insurer liable to pay compensation....
The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the order dated 09.07.2009 passed by the Labour Officer and Commissioner...
- 134
High Court
- 101
High Court
- 82
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification under the BDA Act....
A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, who are landowners, challenged the preliminary notifica...
- 98
High Court
- 98
