High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification under the BDA Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, who are landowners, challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and Section 17 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, and the final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under Section 19 of the BDA Act. The notifications pertained to the acquisition of lands for the formation of a layout called Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority. The respondents included the State of Karnataka and the BDA. The case numbers included W.P. No. 32186 of 2010 and many connected matters. The judgment text provided does not include the court's reasoning or final decision.

Issue of Consideration

Validity of land acquisition notifications issued by BDA for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 19

W.P. No. 32186 of 2010 (LA-BDA) and connected matters

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates for petitioners; D. Nagaraj, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.1; Jayakumar S Patil, Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3

Sri. R. Shankaran and others

The State of Karnataka, Bangalore Development Authority, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and the final notification dated 18.2.2010 for acquisition of their lands for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

Filing Reason

The BDA issued notifications to acquire land for layout formation; aggrieved land owners filed petitions.

Issues

Whether the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and Section 17 of the BDA Act is valid? Whether the final notification dated 18.2.2010 under Section 19 of the BDA Act is valid?

Judgment Excerpts

praying to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act for the Layout called Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 17(1), Section 17(3), Section 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification un...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Orissa High Court's Order Quashing Land Settlement in Favour of Temple Managing Committee; Issue of 'Amrutamanohi' Lands Under OEA Act and Temple Act