Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners Against Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. Notifications Issued Under Sections 17 and 19 of BDA Act Challenged.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-02 19:28:48
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Validity of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 for acquisition of land for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 18

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 (and connected matters)

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy, J.

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates, D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S. Patil, A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar

R. Shankaran and Ors.

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition notifications.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 in respect of petitioners' lands.

Filing Reason

Acquisition of petitioners' lands for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority.

Issues

Validity of preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 and final notification dated 18.02.2010 for acquisition of land for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India, 1950: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Land acquisition Preliminary notification Final notification Bangalore Development Authority Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Writ petition Articles 226 and 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners Against Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. Notifications Issued Under Sections 17 and 19 of BDA Act Challenged. 2026-08-02 19:28:48
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging NA Permission Cancellation for Land of Restricted Tenure. Failure to Obtain Prior Consent Under Section 43 of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 Renders NA Permission Void Ab Initio. 2026-08-02 19:28:45
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Acquittal natural justice murder compensation Burden of Proof Benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?