Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners Against Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. Notifications Issued Under Sections 17 and 19 of BDA Act Challenged.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-14 23:31:36
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Validity of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 for acquisition of land for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 18

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 (and connected matters)

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy, J.

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates, D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S. Patil, A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar

R. Shankaran and Ors.

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition notifications.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 in respect of petitioners' lands.

Filing Reason

Acquisition of petitioners' lands for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority.

Issues

Validity of preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 and final notification dated 18.02.2010 for acquisition of land for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India, 1950: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Land acquisition Preliminary notification Final notification Bangalore Development Authority Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Writ petition Articles 226 and 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Ceiling Land Transfer Case Where Transfers Declared Void. Section 12-A Proviso (d) of Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 Inapplicable Because Transfer Held Void Means No Transfer in Eye of... 2026-09-18 04:21:19
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes EPFO Recovery Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Serve Enforcement Officer's Report. Section 7A Proceedings Set Aside as Petitioner Was Denied Opportunity to Rebut Dues Assessment Statement. 2026-09-18 04:21:19
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land Acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Under Specific Relief Act, 19...

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Appeal — Sets Aside NCL...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Lost Your Password?