Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners Against Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. Notifications Issued Under Sections 17 and 19 of BDA Act Challenged.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-20 10:27:20
  • 96
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Validity of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 for acquisition of land for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 18

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 (and connected matters)

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy, J.

Udaykumar H.B., D.L. Jagadeesh, A. Nagarajappa, G. Krishna Murthy, M/s. Agnihotri Associates, D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S. Patil, A. Lokanath, I.G. Gachchinamath, P.S. Dinesh Kumar

R. Shankaran and Ors.

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition notifications.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 in respect of petitioners' lands.

Filing Reason

Acquisition of petitioners' lands for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority.

Issues

Validity of preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 and final notification dated 18.02.2010 for acquisition of land for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India, 1950: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Land acquisition Preliminary notification Final notification Bangalore Development Authority Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Writ petition Articles 226 and 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State-Owned Self-Financing Engineering Colleges to Depart from Unni Krishnan Scheme. Government-Controlled Technical Institutions Not Covered by Private College Fee Regulation Scheme Under Unni Krishnan, (1993) 1 SCC 645. 2026-11-02 06:15:21
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Execution Decree Holder to Seek Possession Against Third Party Resisters Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. The Court held that executing court can decide objections of third parties claiming independent title without requiring a separ... 2026-11-02 06:15:20
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation Jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?