Search Results for "award not speaking"

1133 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1133 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals by Both Management and Union in Transfer Dispute. Transfer Order Held Not Mala Fide and Back Wages Denied Due to Efflux of Time in Industrial Dispute Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present Intra Court Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent were filed by both the Writ Petitioner/Union and the respondent/Management, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Application to Vacate Section 9 Interim Injunction in Scrap Contract Dispute. Jurisdictional Objection Based on Seat of Arbitration at Bhavnagar, Gujarat, and Allegations of Suppression of Material Facts Raised.

The case involved an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Madras High Court. The applicants, M/s.Gosea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute with Western Geco International Ltd. — Delay in Payment of Mobilization Advance Constituted Breach by ONGC, Entitling Contractor to Damages of US$ 2,936,607.82.

The case involves a challenge by Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), a public sector undertaking, against an arbitral award dated 4-2-2005 made...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in LPG Dealership Dispute — Termination Upheld as Valid. Arbitrator's findings on breach of agreement clauses and quantification of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Ms. Anila Gautam Jain, proprietress of M/s. Badal Agency, was appointed as a dealer by the Respondent, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute. Court Allows Appointment of Receiver to Secure Hypothecated Assets Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed three applications before the Madras High Court: Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute Over Hypothecated Assets. Court allows appointment of Receiver under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to preserve assets pending arbitration.

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...