WRIT PETITION NO. 7248 OF 2014
6 May 2025...
Search Results for "interim stage"
6131 result(s) found
Found 6131 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Arbitrator's Refusal of Interim Relief in Development Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in order denying interim injunction to developer under Development Agreement dated 3/2/2018.
5 Apr 2023The petitioner, M/s Viraj Kamman Real Estate Developers Pvt Ltd, a real estate development company, entered into a Development Agreement dated 3/2/201...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Musical Fountain and Viewer's Gallery at Futala Tank, Holding Lake Not a Declared Wetland Under Wetlands Rules. Court directs compliance with environmental safeguards and prohibits permanent construction within the lake body.
30 Nov 2023The present proceedings were filed as a Public Interest Litigation by Swacch Association, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Interim Applications in Partnership Dispute — Parties Agree to Consent Terms for Capital Contribution and Interest Determination. The Court disposed of the applications as withdrawn, recording the consent order dated 18.01.2022 which required additional capital contributions and referral of interest disputes to the firm's Chartered Accountant.
14 Sep 2022The present matter involves two Interim Applications (IA No. 3499 of 2022 and IA No. 3873 of 2021) filed by Prakash Balasaheb Chavan and Others (Appli...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Sugar Factory's Petition Against Injunction in Share Forfeiture Dispute. Court holds that forfeiture of shares for non-payment of call money is valid under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act and byelaws, and that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting injunction without considering prima facie case.
29 Jun 2010The petitioner, Shree Vitthal Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, c...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Interim Injunction Set Aside Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case for trademark infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 as the mark was originally owned by the joint venture company and the assignment was disputed.
28 Jul 2011The case involves two appeals against a common judgment and order dated 23.12.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No.553 of 20...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd. — Appointment of Arbitrator and Interim Relief Granted. Court appointed sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Act to protect petitioner's interests pending arbitration.
16 Dec 2024The petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 11401 of 2024 under Section 11 of the Arbitratio...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Dabur in Disparagement and Trademark Infringement Suit Over Amla Hair Oil Advertisements. The court held that the defendant's television commercial disparaged the plaintiff's 'Nihar' amla hair oil by falsely implying inferiority, violating principles of comparative advertising under trademark law.
4 Dec 2019The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a manufacturer of household brands including 'Nihar' amla hair oil, filed a commercial IP suit alleging that the defend...
- 171
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Petition Against Misconduct by Special Executive Magistrate in Section 107 CrPC Proceedings. Court Holds That Police Officers Acting as Executive Magistrates Must Follow Judicial Procedure and Cannot Humiliate Advocates.
7 Jun 2006The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the practice and procedure adopted ...
- 183
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Procedure Under Chapter VIII CrPC — Police Officers Acting as Special Executive Magistrates Must Follow Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Court Directs Strict Compliance with Sections 107, 111, 112, 116, 117 and 122 and Prohibits Unauthorized Detention and Misconduct.
7 Jun 2006The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the practice and procedure followed...
- 120
