Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd. — Appointment of Arbitrator and Interim Relief Granted. Court appointed sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Act to protect petitioner's interests pending arbitration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 11401 of 2024 under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes with the respondent, Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd., arising from a contract that contained an arbitration clause. Additionally, the petitioner filed Interim Application (L) No. 24424 of 2024 under Section 9 of the Act seeking interim relief pending arbitration. The court, presided over by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, considered the submissions of both parties. The petitioner argued that disputes had arisen under the contract and that the arbitration clause mandated reference to arbitration. The respondent did not oppose the appointment of an arbitrator but contested the need for interim relief. The court examined the existence of the arbitration agreement and the nature of the disputes. It held that the arbitration agreement was valid and the disputes were arbitrable. Consequently, the court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes. Regarding the interim application, the court found that the petitioner had made out a case for interim protection to prevent irreparable harm and preserve the subject matter. The court granted interim relief in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to maintain status quo regarding certain assets pending the arbitral proceedings. The court also directed the arbitrator to expedite the proceedings. The judgment was delivered on 2024-12-16.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of arbitration agreement - Dispute referable to arbitration - Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties arising out of a contract containing an arbitration clause - Held that the arbitration agreement exists and the dispute is arbitrable (Paras 1-10).

B) Arbitration Law - Interim Relief - Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Interim protection pending arbitration - Court granted interim relief in favor of the petitioner to protect its interests pending the arbitral proceedings - Held that interim measures are necessary to preserve the subject matter of the dispute (Paras 11-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and whether interim relief under Section 9 of the Act should be granted pending arbitration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 11401 of 2024 and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The court also allowed Interim Application (L) No. 24424 of 2024 and granted interim relief in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to maintain status quo regarding certain assets pending the arbitral proceedings. The arbitrator was directed to expedite the proceedings.

Law Points

  • Appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • Existence of arbitration agreement
  • Dispute referable to arbitration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (11) 4

Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 11401 of 2024 with Interim Application (L) No. 24424 of 2024

2024-12-16

Somasekhar Sundaresan

Mr. Kevic Setalvad, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Bhushan Shah, Mr. Aakash Mehta and Mr. Gaurav Edekar i/b Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co., for Petitioner/Applicant; Mr. Gautam Ankhad a/w Mr. Gaurang Jhaveri, Mr. Harsh Nishar, Mrs. Vandana Bait and Ms. Iti Sharma i/b Mr. Amey Deshpande for Respondent

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial arbitration petition for appointment of arbitrator and interim application for interim relief

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and interim relief under Section 9 of the Act pending arbitration.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the parties under a contract containing an arbitration clause, and the petitioner sought to refer the disputes to arbitration and obtain interim protection.

Issues

Whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996? Whether interim relief under Section 9 of the Act should be granted pending arbitration?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that disputes had arisen under the contract and the arbitration clause mandated reference to arbitration, and that interim relief was necessary to protect its interests. Respondent did not oppose appointment of arbitrator but contested the need for interim relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the arbitration agreement existed and the disputes were arbitrable, warranting appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Further, the court found that the petitioner had made out a case for interim relief under Section 9 of the Act to prevent irreparable harm and preserve the subject matter of the dispute pending arbitration.

Judgment Excerpts

The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The court granted interim relief in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to maintain status quo regarding certain assets pending the arbitral proceedings.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 11401 of 2024 under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator, and Interim Application (L) No. 24424 of 2024 under Section 9 of the Act seeking interim relief. The court heard both matters together and delivered judgment on 2024-12-16.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11, Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation Rate from Rs.10 to Rs.30 per sq m. Market value determined based on comparable sale instances and potential for non-agricultural use despite tenancy restr...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd. — Appointment of Arbitrator and Interim Relief Granted. Court appointed sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the ...