Search Results for "Electricity tariff"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Electricity tariff"

184 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Commission's Order Restricting Depreciation to Actual Supply Period in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Depreciation under Regulation 6.32 of DERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Generation Tariff) Regulations, 2011 cannot be allowed beyond the period of actual supply of electricity to consumers, as consumer interest is paramount under Section 61(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

7 May 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission) against the judgment of the Appellate Tribunal ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute. Demand Charges Must Be Based on Actual Utilisation, Not Contract Demand, Under Clause 14.11 of Tariff and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations, 2005.

27 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Power Supply Agreement Dispute — Abrupt Stoppage of Power Constitutes Breach. The Court upheld the arbitrator's award of damages and interest, finding no patent illegality under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Mar 2026

The appellant, OPG Power Generation Pvt. Ltd., was the supplier of electricity under a power supply agreement dated 18.04.2018 with the respondent, Sh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses DISCOM's Appeal in Solar PPA Force Majeure Dispute — Restrictive Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 Affirmed. Government Delays in Approvals Constitute Force Majeure; No Tariff Reduction or Liquidated Damages When Developer Not at Fault.

27 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India dismissed appeals by Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Authority's Order in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Activity Held as Manufacturing, Not R&D, for Tariff Classification Under Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Jul 2024

The petitioner, a power distribution company, challenged an order of the Appellate Authority under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which hel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission's Order Imposing Liquidated Damages and Tariff Reduction in Solar Power Project Dispute. The court held that the Scheduled Commissioning Date was 16.10.2017, and since injection of power into the grid occurred on 17.10.2017, the projects were delayed, justifying penalties under the Power Purchase Agreement.

3 May 2021

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, which reversed an order by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commissio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Carrying Cost in Change in Law Claims Under PPA — Restitutionary Principle Upheld. Article 13.2 of Power Purchase Agreement Entitles Generating Company to Carrying Cost from Date of Change in Law Till Approval.

25 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Haryana Discoms) and Gujarat Urja Vika...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Bill Based on Contract Demand Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Consumer Liable for Minimum Charges Even Without Actual Consumption. The court held that the consumer cannot unilaterally reduce contract demand and must pay minimum charges as per tariff, and Section 126 assessment for unauthorized use is not applicable when billing is based on contract demand.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Vinay Tilokchand Karnavat, a medical practitioner running a hospital in Sillod, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and that the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under Sections 9, 10, and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Jan 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Tata Power Company Limited and others against the Government of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner,...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)