Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and that the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under Sections 9, 10, and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Tata Power Company Limited and others against the Government of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, a generating company, held licenses to generate and supply electric power granted between 1907 and 1953. After the Electricity Act, 2003 came into force on 10 June 2003, generation was delicensed, and the petitioner separated its generation and distribution businesses. The petitioner sought open access to supply electricity to its consumers, including a captive generating plant. The distribution licensee, Respondent No.2, opposed the application, arguing that the petitioner must obtain a distribution license or comply with additional conditions such as payment of cross-subsidy surcharge and other charges. The petitioner challenged the denial of open access before the Bombay High Court. The Court examined the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, particularly Sections 9, 10, 42, and 86. The Court held that a generating company has a statutory right to open access under Section 9 read with Section 42, and the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the legislative intent of promoting competition and open access. The Court directed the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission to process the petitioner's application for open access without imposing unlawful conditions. The Court also held that the regulatory commission has the power to determine terms and conditions for open access and must ensure non-discriminatory open access. The petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to grant open access in accordance with the Act.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Open Access - Captive Generating Plant - Sections 9, 10, 42, 86 Electricity Act, 2003 - The petitioner, a generating company, sought open access to supply electricity to its consumers. The distribution licensee opposed, arguing that the petitioner must obtain a license or comply with additional conditions. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access as a statutory right under Section 9 read with Section 42, and the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the legislative intent of promoting competition and open access. The Court directed the regulatory commission to process the application for open access without imposing unlawful conditions. (Paras 2-10)

B) Electricity Law - Regulatory Commission - Powers and Functions - Section 86 Electricity Act, 2003 - The Court held that the State Regulatory Commission has the power to determine the terms and conditions for open access and must ensure non-discriminatory open access. The Commission cannot delegate its powers to the distribution licensee or allow the licensee to impose conditions that are inconsistent with the Act. (Paras 11-15)

C) Electricity Law - Delicensed Generation - Right to Supply - Section 9 Electricity Act, 2003 - The Court clarified that a generating company, after delicensing, is free to supply electricity to any consumer or licensee without the need for a separate license. The only requirement is compliance with the grid code and other technical standards. The distribution licensee cannot insist on a license or additional charges that are not provided under the Act. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and whether the distribution licensee can deny such open access or impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under the Electricity Act, 2003.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition and directed the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission to process the petitioner's application for open access without imposing unlawful conditions. The distribution licensee was directed to grant open access in accordance with the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.

Law Points

  • Open access
  • Captive generating plant
  • Distribution licensee
  • Regulatory commission
  • Electricity Act 2003
  • Sections 9
  • 10
  • 42
  • 86
  • Delicensed generation
  • Power trading
  • Non-discriminatory open access
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011:BHC-OS:865-DB

WRIT PETITION NO.71 OF 2011

2011-01-18

DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANOOP V. MOHTA

2011:BHC-OS:865-DB

Mr. Iqbal Chagla, Senior Advocate with Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Mr. Sitesh Mukherjee, Mr. Sagar Divekar, Ms. Nandini Gore, Mr. Vikrant Negi and Ms. Devangee Ganatra i/b M/s.Trilegal for the Petitioners. Mr. V.R. Dhond, A panel counsel with Mr. A.B. Ketkar, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. J.J. Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anjali Chandurkar, Mr. D.J. Kakalia, Mr. H.E. Desai and Mr. Onkar Chandurkar i/b Mulla & Mulla & CBC for Respondent No.2. Ms. Kavita Anchan with Ms. Priya Baliga i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. for Respondent No.3. Mr. Ashish A. Alaspurkar for Respondent No.5. Ms. Shilpa Kapil for Respondent No.6.

The Tata Power Company Limited and others

Government of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging denial of open access by distribution licensee to a generating company.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought a direction to the respondents to grant open access for supply of electricity to its consumers, including a captive generating plant, without imposing unlawful conditions.

Filing Reason

The distribution licensee denied open access to the petitioner, a generating company, and imposed conditions such as requiring a distribution license or payment of cross-subsidy surcharge, which the petitioner contended were contrary to the Electricity Act, 2003.

Issues

Whether a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers under the Electricity Act, 2003. Whether the distribution licensee can deny open access or impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that under Section 9 of the Electricity Act, 2003, a generating company is entitled to supply electricity to any consumer or licensee and has a statutory right to open access under Section 42. The distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that are not provided under the Act. The respondents argued that the petitioner must obtain a distribution license or comply with additional conditions such as payment of cross-subsidy surcharge and other charges, as open access is subject to regulations by the State Commission.

Ratio Decidendi

A generating company has a statutory right to open access under Section 9 read with Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the legislative intent of promoting competition and open access. The regulatory commission must ensure non-discriminatory open access and cannot delegate its powers to the distribution licensee.

Judgment Excerpts

On diverse dates between 1907 and 1953 licenses were granted to the Petitioner to generate and supply electric power. The Act delicensed generation activity and allowed generating companies a measure of freedom to supply electric power to consumers and licensees of their choice. Among the main features of the Bill was that generation was being delicensed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the denial of open access by the distribution licensee. The Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 18 January 2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Electricity Act, 2003: Sections 9, 10, 42, 86
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supp...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife Over Refusal to Prepare Breakfast — Life Sentence Confirmed Under Section 302 IPC. Extra-judicial Confession and Child Witness Testimony Found Sufficient to Sustain Conviction for Murder Under...