Search Results for "Government Resolution 2006"

1948 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1948 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Regular First Appeal No.964/2006 Against Dismissal of Permanent Injunction Suit. The Appeal Involves Dispute Over Possession of Land Allotted by Bangalore Development Authority to a Co-operative Housing Society.

The appellant, Telecom Employees Co-operative Housing Society Limited, a co-operative society, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Non-Arbitrability. Disputes Relating to Termination for Convenience and Non-Compete Obligations Held Not Arbitrable Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Capalpha Trade Private Limited, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tribunal Order in Seniority Dispute — Seniority List Must Include All Eligible Employees as on Cut-off Date.

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjay Atmaram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 2/12/2009 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Allegations of Encroachment on Government Land Led to Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3); Petitioners Argued Encroachments Were by Spouses, Not Themselves.

The petitioners were elected members of Gram Panchayat Kalamb, with petitioner no.1 elected as Sarpanch. Respondent nos.5 and 6 filed a complaint on 5...