Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Dereservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. The court held that mere passing of a resolution for acquisition does not constitute steps for acquisition under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Madanlal Lalchand Jain, owned land bearing S.No. 38/3 at Nandurbar. The Assistant Director of Town Planning published a draft development plan on 14/2/1976, which was sanctioned on 6/1/1979, reserving the land as site no. 10 for a shopping centre. Since the land was not acquired for over 18 years, the petitioner issued a purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) on 30/7/1996 to the Municipal Council (respondent no. 3). The Municipal Council passed a resolution for acquisition on 16/12/1996, but no declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published, nor did the Collector initiate any acquisition proposal. The six-month period under Section 127 expired on 29/1/1997. The petitioner sought a declaration that the reservation had lapsed and a direction against the Collector not to proceed with acquisition. The State contended that the site was again reserved in a revised draft plan published on 18/6/1998 and that steps for acquisition had been taken, including a resolution on 16/12/1996 and a proposal submitted to the Collector on 31/1/1997. The court analyzed Section 127 of the MRTP Act, which provides that if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within six months of a purchase notice, the reservation lapses. The court found that no effective steps for acquisition were taken within the six-month period; the resolution alone was insufficient. The court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation lapsed on 29/1/1997 and directing the respondents not to proceed with acquisition.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Reservation - Lapse of Reservation - Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Purchase Notice - The petitioner, owner of land reserved for a shopping centre, issued a purchase notice under Section 127 on 30/7/1996. The Municipal Council passed a resolution for acquisition on 16/12/1996 but no declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published nor any proposal initiated by the Collector within six months. The court held that the reservation lapsed automatically on 29/1/1997 as no steps for acquisition were taken within the stipulated period. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation of land for a shopping centre lapses under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, when no acquisition proceedings are initiated within six months of the purchase notice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation of site no. 10 for shopping centre lapsed on 29/1/1997, and directed the respondents not to proceed with acquisition of the said land.

Law Points

  • Section 127 of MRTP Act
  • 1966
  • Purchase Notice
  • Lapse of Reservation
  • Automatic Dereservation
  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (06) 14

Writ Petition No. 4698 of 1997

2010-06-30

B.R. Gavai, S.V. Gangapurwala

Mr. J.R. Shah for petitioner, Mr. V.D. Rakh for State, Mr. A.B. Girase for respondent no. 3

Madanlal Lalchand Jain

The State of Maharashtra, The Collector Dhule, Municipal Council Nandurbar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration that reservation of land for shopping centre has lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that reservation of site no. 10 has lapsed and direction to respondents not to proceed with acquisition.

Filing Reason

Land reserved for shopping centre was not acquired within six months of purchase notice under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

Issues

Whether the reservation of land lapses under Section 127 of MRTP Act when no acquisition proceedings are initiated within six months of purchase notice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Land reserved for 18 years; purchase notice issued on 30/7/1996; no acquisition steps within six months; reservation lapsed on 29/1/1997. Respondents: Resolution for acquisition passed on 16/12/1996; proposal submitted to Collector on 31/1/1997; land again reserved in revised plan published on 18/6/1998; reservation did not lapse.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within six months of a purchase notice, the reservation lapses automatically. Mere passing of a resolution for acquisition does not constitute steps for acquisition; actual initiation of acquisition proceedings, such as publication of declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, is required.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner herein is the owner of a property bearing S.No. 38/3 situated at Nandurbar. As the said land was not acquired even though the same was under reservation for more than 18 years, the present petitioner invoking his rights U/s 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act issued purchase notice on 30/7/1996. Six months period as contemplated U/s 127 of the M.R.T.P. Act came to an end on 29/1/1997. According to the petitioner, as the said land is not acquired nor any steps of acquisition of the said land has been taken within the stipulated period of six months, the said land automatically stands dereserved by operation of Statute on 29/1/1997.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 4698 of 1997 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking declaration that reservation of land lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act. The petition was heard and decided on 30/6/2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 127
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Dereservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. The court held that mere passing of a resolution for acquisition does not constitute steps ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Authority's Order Recognizing Right of Way Over Agricultural Land. Court upholds Deputy Collector's finding that an approach road existed since 1974 consolidation and was mentioned in sale deed...