Search Results for "Andheri East"

703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993

The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reason to Believe. Transfer of Development Rights Not Constituting Transfer Under Section 2(47) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Late Bharat Jayantilal Patel (since deceased through legal heir Smt. Minal Bharat Patel), challenged a notice issued under Section 148...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in MEIS Export Incentive Case — Policy Relaxation Committee's Rejection Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind. Amendment of Shipping Bills Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962 Held Valid and Binding on DGFT for Grant of MEIS Benefits.

The petitioner, Technocraft Industries (India) Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, manufactures scaffolding steel products ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against GST Appellate Orders Due to Non-Constitution of Tribunal. Failure to Constitute Appellate Tribunal Under Section 112 of MGST Act Renders Alternative Remedy Ineffective, Entitling Assessees to Direct Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The petitioners, Gulf Oil Lubricants India Ltd. and Dinesh Engineers Limited along with Dinesh K. Kargal, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited (formerly Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited), challenged a notice dated 28 March 2008 issued under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Demolition and Reconstruction of Cinema Structure Subject to Height Restrictions Under Aircraft Act and Navy Act. Prior Permission from Ministry of Defence Required for Reconstruction to Ensure Compliance with Height Restrictions Near Naval Air Station.

The Petitioner, Sameer Baijanath Joshi, is the owner of land admeasuring 3,627.90 sq. metres bearing Plot No.9-A, CTS No. 37 and 38A at Village Juhu, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Immediate Refund of Undisputed Income Tax Refund Under Section 168(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Failure to Release Admitted Refund Despite Reminders Constitutes Arbitrary Action

The petitioner, Group M Media India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court alleging failure by the respondents (income ta...