Bombay High Court Directs Immediate Refund of Undisputed Income Tax Refund Under Section 168(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Failure to Release Admitted Refund Despite Reminders Constitutes Arbitrary Action

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Group M Media India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court alleging failure by the respondents (income tax authorities) to release an undisputed refund determined under Section 168(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Financial Year 2017-2018 (Assessment Year 2018-2019). The refund was admitted by the respondents themselves in the intimation/order issued under Section 168(1). Despite several reminders sent by the petitioner, the respondents did not release the refund. The petitioner sought a direction to the respondents to refund the admitted amount. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, noted that the refund was undisputed and determined by the respondents. The court held that once a refund is determined and undisputed, the revenue cannot withhold it arbitrarily. The court directed the respondents to refund the amount along with interest as per law within four weeks from the date of the order. The petition was allowed in terms of the direction.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Refund under Section 168(1) - Undisputed Refund - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 168(1) - Petitioner sought direction to release refund determined by respondents themselves under Section 168(1) for AY 2018-2019 - Respondents failed to release refund despite reminders - Court held that once refund is determined and undisputed, it must be released without delay; withholding it is arbitrary and unsustainable - Directed respondents to refund the amount with interest within four weeks (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents are justified in withholding the undisputed refund determined under Section 168(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2018-2019 despite repeated reminders by the petitioner

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Respondents directed to refund the amount determined under Section 168(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2018-2019 along with interest as per law within four weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Refund due under Section 168(1) of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 must be released without delay once determined
  • Failure to release undisputed refund despite reminders is arbitrary and violative of Article 14
  • Revenue cannot withhold refund on grounds not specified in law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (12) 109

Writ Petition (L) No.12786 of 2023

2023-12-18

K. R. Shriram, Dr. Neela Gokhale

2023:BHC-OS:15121-DB

Mr. Dharan V. Gandhi a/w. Ms. Aanchal Vyas for petitioner, Mr. Devvrat Singh for respondents – Revenue

Group M Media India Private Limited

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, International Tax, Circle – 1(1)(2), Mumbai & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to release undisputed income tax refund determined under Section 168(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to refund the admitted amount determined under Section 168(1) for Assessment Year 2018-2019

Filing Reason

Failure of respondents to release the undisputed refund despite reminders

Issues

Whether the respondents are justified in withholding the undisputed refund determined under Section 168(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that refund was undisputed and determined by respondents themselves, yet not released despite reminders Respondents did not raise any substantial objection to the release of refund

Ratio Decidendi

Once a refund is determined and undisputed under Section 168(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the revenue cannot withhold it arbitrarily; failure to release such refund despite reminders is unsustainable and violative of Article 14.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner has approached this Court alleging that there is failure on the part of respondents to release the undisputed refund due and determined by respondents themselves in the intimation/order issued under Section 168(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Since pleadings have been completed, we decided to hear the petition at the admission stage itself. Therefore, Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition alleging failure to release undisputed refund; pleadings completed; court heard at admission stage and allowed petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 168(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Applicant in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Change in Circumstances and Non-Custodial Investigation. Second Anticipatory Bail Application Allowed as Applicant Cooperated with Investigation and No Custodial ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation ...