Search Results for "Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act 1993"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Illegal Tax Collected by Grama Panchayath from Poultry Farm Owner. Levy of Property Tax on Agricultural Land Used for Poultry Farming Held Unauthorized Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioner, K Narasimhamurthy, is the absolute owner of agricultural land bearing No.35 measuring 4 acres situated at Nagasandra Village, Sondekop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Gram Panchayat Election Tie-Breaker Case — Returning Officer's Decision to Draw Lots Upheld. Rule 73 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1993 Provides for Determination of Result by Lot When Candidates Secure Equal Votes.

The appellant, Chandrakala, contested the Gram Panchayat election for Ward No.6 of Degalmadi Gram Panchayat. On 30.12.2020, the Returning Officer (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Constitutional Mandate for Timely Municipal Elections in BBMP. Amendment Act 17 of 2020 struck down as ultra vires Article 243-U of the Constitution.

The case involved a public interest litigation filed by two corporators of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) seeking directions to conduct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Adyaksha and Upadyaksha — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 as No Prior Notice Required for Special Meeting Convened by Prescribed Authority

The petitioners, who are members of Somaguddi Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Adyaksha (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Panchayat Notice Against Telecom Tower Operator for Lack of Authority Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Panchayat Cannot Interfere with Licensed Telecom Infrastructure Sharing as It Falls Under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and DoT Guidelines.

The petitioner, Tower Vision India Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act and licensed by the Ministry of Communications, Depar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery Notices in Panchayat Misappropriation Case. Petitioner failed to establish violation of natural justice or jurisdiction; recovery under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 upheld.

The petitioner, Renuka, was the Panchayat Development Officer of Gram Panchayat Chikka Rugi. She was found to have misappropriated funds of the Gram P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lokayukta Report and Recovery Notices in Panchayat Misappropriation Case. Petitioner Withdraws Challenge to Lokayukta Report, Court Upholds Recovery of Misappropriated Amounts Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Renuka, a former Panchayat Development Officer of Gram Panchayat Chikka Rugi, filed writ petitions challenging a report under Section ...