Search Results for "APMC Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "APMC Rules"

91 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Conversion of Leave and License to Lease-cum-Sale for APMC Shop — Rule 12(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation of Allotment of Property in Market Yards) Rules, 2004 Mandates Conversion Upon Satisfaction of Conditions. The court quashed the resolution and notice directing vacation and directed the authorities to convert the agreement.

8 Dec 2023

The petitioner, M/s. P.C. Guddad & Sons, a partnership firm, is a licensed market functionary and trader operating in the Agricultural Produce Market ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

19 Aug 2020

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes License Cancellation Orders in APMC Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' licenses cancelled without show cause notice or hearing, set aside for non-compliance with Section 127 of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966.

23 Jul 2020

The petitioners, three firms engaged in flower, fruit, and vegetable trading in Tumakuru, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee in Specific Performance Suit — Lease Agreement with Option to Purchase Enforceable Against Lessor's Successor-in-Interest. Court held that a lease deed containing an option to purchase the leased property is a contract for sale and specific performance can be granted against the successor-in-interest who took the property with notice of the agreement.

5 Mar 2020

The appellant, Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Bellary, was the defendant No.1 in a suit for specific performance filed by the respon...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Lease Cum Sale Deed for APMC Shop — Contractual Dispute Not Enforceable via Writ Jurisdiction. Writ of Mandamus Cannot Be Issued to Compel Execution of Lease Cum Sale Deed as No Fundamental or Statutory Right Is Involved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950.

30 May 2019

The petitioner, C. Vijaykumar, a market functionary holding a valid licence, was allotted Shop No. B-24 in the APMC Yard, Davanagere, in the year 2000...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement Cancelling Shop Allotment in APMC Yard — Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Licence Cancelled Without Notice or Hearing, Held Arbitrary and Illegal Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Mohammed Shah Nawaz, proprietor of Shah Nawaz and Brothers, had been carrying on business as a commission agent in the vegetable marke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Arbitrator Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. Single Judge Holds Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 Not Exhaustive and Maintains Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Modern Anitasha Electronics, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against APMC Dismissal Due to Alternative Remedy of Second Appeal Under Rule 104 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967. Court holds that Rule 103 prescribes procedure for imposing penalties under Rule 102, and appeal lies under Rule 104, not Section 52B of the Act.

1 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shantaram Sonawane, an employee of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Jalgaon, was dismissed from service. He filed an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Article 226. Held that election disputes must be raised before the Election Tribunal under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were voters and candidates in the election of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Gangapur, filed two writ petitions under...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)