Search Results for "cause title amendment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "cause title amendment"

1728 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1728 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposed of Batch Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout at Bangalore. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates batch of writ petitions challenging land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The petitions challenge preliminary notification under Section 17(1)(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and final notification under Section 19(1), alleging procedural lapses in the formation of the layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.

11 Jul 2014

The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...

High Court

KAHC010000842011_1

11 Jul 2014

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

High Court

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003

21 Nov 2006

The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Non-Examination of Key Witness and Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act. Sale Deed in Favour of Plaintiffs Proved Valid, Subsequent Transfers by Vendor After Losing Title Held Void.

9 Mar 2026

The present First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the appellants-original plaintiffs challenging the judgme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Retired Employees in Cooperative Bank Pension Dispute - Pension Scheme Cannot Be Unilaterally Discontinued After Employees Have Opted and Availed Benefits Under Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Banks Employees Pension, Family Pension and General Provident Fund Rules, 1989. The Court held that pension is a deferred wage and accrued right, and amendments to service rules under Section 84A(2) of Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 must be prospective, protecting employees' legitimate expectations.

11 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.'s decision to discontinue a pension scheme introduced in 1989 f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings for Failure to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court held that mere production of a cheque during evidence without other proof does not satisfy the requirement of readiness and willingness, and a plaintiff claiming additional payment beyond the agreement must prove it.

30 Sep 2022

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell. The appellant, original defendant no.1, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

28 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)