Search Results for "pathway"

112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment from Cart Track Due to Pending Civil Suit. Disputed facts relating to civil rights are to be adjudicated only before Civil Court in the civil suit already instituted.

The petitioner, L.Suresh Babu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the second re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition to Stop Temple Construction on Water Body and Orders Restoration of Pond. Court Holds That Water Bodies Are Public Trust Resources and Cannot Be Encroached Upon for Any Purpose, Including Religious Construction.

The petitioner, Pooja, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, to stop the construction of a temple...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Dismissed as No Substantial Question of Law Arises.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiffs, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachments on Public Pathway — Mandamus Issued Under Article 226. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty.

The petitioner, Dravidaselvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Removal in Public Interest. Writ of Mandamus issued to consider representation within three months, as non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Andiyappan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Pathway Encroachment — Mandamus Issued for Disposal Within Three Months. Statutory Authority Has Duty to Consider Representation; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Balachandran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, N.G. Seenivasan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Cour...