Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition to Stop Temple Construction on Water Body and Orders Restoration of Pond. Court Holds That Water Bodies Are Public Trust Resources and Cannot Be Encroached Upon for Any Purpose, Including Religious Construction.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 209
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Pooja, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, to stop the construction of a temple in Adiyankuppam Village, Vandavasi Taluk, on Survey No.209, which was allegedly encroaching upon a pond (water body). The petitioner contended that the respondents 5 to 8 were constructing a temple on government poramboke land classified as 'Kulam' (water body), causing obstruction to the movement of people. The respondents 5 to 8 opposed the petition, claiming that a temple had existed nearby for 35 years and that the construction was merely renovation. The HR&CE Department submitted that a Fit Person had been appointed for the temple, but inspection revealed that the new construction was in a water body with no pathway to access it, and the adjacent land was private patta land. The court, after hearing all parties, held that water bodies are public trust resources and cannot be encroached upon. The court directed the District Collector and other revenue authorities to take immediate steps to remove the encroachments and restore the pond to its original condition. The court also directed the HR&CE authorities to ensure that no construction is carried out on water bodies or government poramboke land. The writ petition was allowed with the above directions.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Protection of Water Bodies - Public Trust Doctrine - Construction on Water Body - The court considered whether a temple construction on government poramboke land classified as a water body (Kulam) is permissible. Held that water bodies are public trust resources and cannot be encroached upon for any purpose, including religious construction. The court directed removal of encroachments and restoration of the pond. (Paras 1-7)

B) Religious Endowments - Unauthorized Construction - HR&CE Department - The court noted that the HR&CE Department had appointed a Fit Person for the temple but found that the new construction was in a water body without any pathway. Held that the HR&CE authorities must ensure that no construction is carried out on water bodies or government poramboke land. (Paras 4-6)

C) Administrative Law - Writ of Mandamus - Restoration of Water Body - The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the District Collector and other revenue authorities to take immediate steps to remove encroachments and restore the pond to its original condition. Held that the authorities must act promptly to protect public resources. (Paras 5-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether construction of a temple on government poramboke land classified as a water body (Kulam) is permissible and whether the court should direct restoration of the water body.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. The District Collector and other revenue authorities are directed to take immediate steps to remove the encroachments and restore the pond to its original condition. The HR&CE authorities are directed to ensure no construction on water bodies or government poramboke land.

Law Points

  • Protection of water bodies
  • Public trust doctrine
  • Encroachment on government land
  • Restoration of water bodies
  • Mandamus against unauthorized construction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (01) 189

WP No. 28424 of 2025

2026-01-19

S. M. Subramaniam, C. Kumarappan

2026:MHC:224

Mr.A.Manojkumar for Mr.M.Manimaran (Petitioner), Mr.T.Arun Kumar, AGP for RR1 to 4, Mr.K.C.Karl Marx for RR5 To 8, Mr.N.R.R. Arun Natarajan, SGP (HR&CE) for RR9 to 11

Pooja

The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vandavasi, The Tashildar, Vandavasi Taluk, The Village Administrative Officer, Adiyankuppam Village, Shanthi, S.Rajaselvi, Dirai, Sivakumar, The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Department, The Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Department, Tiruvannamalai, The Assistant Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Department, Tiruvannamalai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus to stop temple construction on a water body and restore the pond.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the District Collector to stop construction of temple in Survey No.209, Adiyankuppam Village, encroaching the pond, and to restore the pond.

Filing Reason

Construction of a temple on government poramboke land classified as 'Kulam' (water body), causing obstruction to people.

Issues

Whether construction of a temple on a water body is permissible? Whether the court should direct restoration of the water body?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Respondents 5 to 8 started constructing a temple in government poramboke land classified as 'Kulam' (water body), causing obstructions. Respondents 5 to 8: Temple existed nearby for 35 years; construction is renovation. HR&CE Department: Inspection revealed new construction in water body with no pathway; adjacent land is private patta.

Ratio Decidendi

Water bodies are public trust resources and cannot be encroached upon for any purpose, including religious construction. The court must protect public resources and direct restoration of encroached water bodies.

Judgment Excerpts

Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the 1st respondent to take effective measures to stop the construction of temple in Adiyankuppam Village... encroaching the pond and subsequently, take appropriate action to restore the pond. Learned counsel for the petitioner would mainly contend that the respondents 5 to 8 started constructing a temple in Government promboke land which is classified as 'Kulam'(water body). Learned Special Government Pleader, HR & CE Department would submit that... New construction is made in a water body and during inspection, the authorities found that there is no pathway to reach the new temple construction.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date. On 04.08.2025, the court suo motu impleaded respondents 9 to 11 (HR&CE authorities). The final order was passed on 19.01.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Divorce Decree in Hindu Marriage Act Case on Ground of Virulent and Incurable Leprosy. Husband Proved Wife Suffered from Lepromatous Leprosy for Over Three Years Under Section 13(1)(iv), and Court Held That Social Approach Canno...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeals in Hyderabad Abolition of Inams Act Matter — Landlord-Tenant Relationship Continued Until July 1, 1960. Section 33 of Hyderabad Abolition of Inams Act, 1954 Saved Mutual Rights and Obligations of Inamdar and Te...