Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

81 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Government Corrigendum Allowing Multiple Cooperative Societies in One Revenue Village. The Court upheld the State Government's authority to amend its policy to permit more than one Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society (PACCS) in a revenue village, finding the corrigendum valid and in the interest of cooperative development.

30 Aug 2024

The judgment concerns three writ petitions challenging a Government Corrigendum dated 14th February 2017 issued by the Ministry of Cooperation, Market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

26 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Vice-Chairman of APMC Challenging Removal Under Section 45(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Show Cause Notice and Removal Order Quashed for Being Vague and Non-Speaking, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

9 Apr 2019

The petitioner, an elected Director and Vice-Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Dhamangaon Railway, challenged an order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Orders of District Deputy Registrar in Election Nomination Dispute. Requirement of Declaration Under Rule 45 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Held Mandatory.

29 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Gyanba s/o Trimbakrao Shirale, challenged the orders of the District Deputy Registrar, Parbhani, which allowed appeals filed by respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Dropping Land Acquisition Proceedings in Collusion Case — Land Reserved for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Since 1993 Cannot Be Released Without Following Statutory Procedure Under MRTP Act, 1966.

9 Dec 2016

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Anjangaon Surji, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Land Acquisition Officer, Minor ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Panchayat Samiti Member's Nomination to Market Committee Over Chairman's Claim — Rule 40A of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Cannot Override Section 13(1)(d) of the Act. The court held that the Panchayat Samiti's resolution electing a member as its representative under Section 13(1)(d) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 is valid and cannot be overridden by Rule 40A of the Rules.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajeshri Arun Munghate, a member of the Panchayat Samiti, Gadchiroli, challenged an order of the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperativ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of APMC Chairman Challenging Removal — Show-Cause Notice Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act Must Specify Charges. Removal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as Notice Was Vague and No Proper Hearing Was Given.

23 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, was a member and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur. He was served with a show-c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against APMC Dismissal Due to Alternative Remedy of Second Appeal Under Rule 104 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967. Court holds that Rule 103 prescribes procedure for imposing penalties under Rule 102, and appeal lies under Rule 104, not Section 52B of the Act.

1 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shantaram Sonawane, an employee of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Jalgaon, was dismissed from service. He filed an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice Against Chairman in APMC Removal Case — Notice Issued by In-charge Officer Without Authority Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act

15 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur, challenged a show-cause notice dated 2.6.201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Article 226. Held that election disputes must be raised before the Election Tribunal under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were voters and candidates in the election of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Gangapur, filed two writ petitions under...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)