Search Results for "Works contract"

1098 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1098 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Works Contracts Held Valid and Disputes Referable to Arbitration.

The applicant, Gold Prism Realty Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Challenge to Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Ruling in Concession Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Binding on Consortium Members as They Were Not Signatories to the Concession Agreement.

The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, a major port constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, issued a glo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds TDS Provisions Under Goa VAT Act for Works Contracts — Rule 4A and Entry C-14 Held Valid. Amendment to Section 28(1) of Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for deduction of tax at source from payments to contractors is constitutionally valid and not ultra vires.

The petitioners, including the All Goa Contractors Association and four contractor companies, challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 4A insert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MCGM Contract Awards in Public Interest Litigation. Court Finds No Irregularity in Tender Process and Upholds Validity of Contracts for Road Works.

The present Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Jayshree Ramakant Khadilkar Pande challenging the award of four contracts by the Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Arbitration Dispute Between Contractor and Sub-Contractor. Court finds that invocation of bank guarantee was fraudulent and would cause irretrievable injustice to the petitioner.

The petitioner, Simplex Infrastructure Limited, a civil and structural construction company, entered into a sub-contract with respondent No. 1, Siemen...