Search Results for "Section 9"

514 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 514 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in U.P. Excise Act Interest Dispute, Holding Licensee Liable for Interest Despite Interim Stay. Interest on Arrears of Excise Revenue is Payable Under Section 38A of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, as Interim Stay Only Suspended Recovery Without Nullifying Statutory Obligation.

The dispute arose from the respondent's license for retail sale of country liquor in Uttar Pradesh for the year 2002-03. The respondent applied for su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Damages. Court fees are not payable on a tentative claim at the initial stage when the exact valuation is to be adjudicated later, as per Section 7(i) of the Court Fees Act, 1870 and Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the respondent, a retired government officer and advocate, against the State of Punjab and its officers for rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revision Petition in Arbitration Dispute Under Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 - Reference Not Barred by Limitation as Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applies and Tribunal Had Power to Extend Period Under Section 18 of the 2008 Act.

The dispute originated from a works contract for drainage work in an industrial area, awarded by the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Confiscation Order in M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act Case After Acquittal. Confiscation of Vehicle Under Section 11(5) is Unjustified When Criminal Charges Are Not Proved, as the Act Lacks a Non-Obstante Clause Ousting Jurisdiction of Criminal Courts.

The dispute arose from the confiscation of a truck under the M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004, after the accused persons, including the tru...