Search Results for "Prolongation costs"

39 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Upholds Arbitral Award Except for Claim No.6. Post-Contractual Changes in Pipeline Alignment and Scope Reduction Lead to Dispute Over Additional Costs and Delay.

The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, invited tenders for construction of a Permeate Conveyance Pipeline as part of a p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Stamp Duty on Renewal of Perpetual Lease Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Levy of stamp duty on renewal of perpetual lease is not manifestly arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur, through a division bench comprising Justices Anil S. Kilor and Rajnish R. Vyas, dismissed two writ petitions challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Possessory Title Not Required for Restoration Under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC. High Court erred in ordering restoration of possession without determining whether respondent had any right to possession under Order XXI Rules 98-100 CPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had allowed the appeal of the respondent (Lt. Col. Nahar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor in Railway Contract Dispute — Extension of Time Granted Without Protest Bars Claim for Liquidated Damages and Interest on Delayed Payments is Allowed Under Interest Act, 1978.

The petitioner, Union of India, acting through the Chief Electrical Engineer (Construction), Central Railway, awarded a contract to the respondent, M/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Steel Coils Supply Dispute — Non-Conforming Goods Justify Rejection and Damages. The court upheld the arbitral award granting damages for breach of contract where goods did not meet specifications under the contract for sale of goods.

The petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 28th May 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Claim of Idling Establishment Due to Prohibition Clause in Contract. Clause 17.3 of General Conditions of Contract Bars Compensation for Delay, Only Extension of Time Permissible.

The Union of India, through the General Manager, Western Railway, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...