KAHC010259352010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Kerala Buildings Act"
390 result(s) found
Found 390 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Kerala Land Reforms Act Case — Quarrying Land Not Exempt as Commercial Site. Land used for quarrying does not fall within the definition of 'commercial site' under Section 2(5) read with Section 81(1)(q) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and is not exempt from ceiling provisions.
30 Sep 2019The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by K.H. Nazar against the judgment of the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court, which held that land used...
- 243
High Court
- 26
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Improvement Compensation Case — Constructive Res Judicata Not Applicable Due to Liberty Reserved by Earlier Order. The Court held that the claim for compensation under the Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958 is not barred by constructive res judicata because the Supreme Court had expressly kept open the remedy in the earlier proceedings.
5 Feb 2019The dispute concerns a large tract of land originally belonging to Vengunadu Kovilakam, leased out in 1897 for 75 years. After the lease expired in 19...
- 193
High Court
- 79
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Revision Order Alleging Excess of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Court Examines Whether Stamp Duty Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 is Payable on Built-Up Area When Sale Deed Conveys Only Undivided Land Share.
25 Jan 2025The litigation arose out of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) between Prestige Estates Projects Limited (developer) and United Breweries (Holdings) ...
- 22
High Court
- 49
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.
11 Jul 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...
- 71
High Court
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.
11 Dec 2006This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...
- 51
