Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010023912010_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-27 06:04:26
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010023912010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 35

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 (and connected matters)

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil

R. Shankaran

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority; Senior Land Acquisition Officer, BDA

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

The litigation involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the acquisition of land by the Bangalore Development Authority for the formation of a layout named Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and/or Sections 17(1) and 17(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, and the final notification dated 18.02.2010 issued under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act, insofar as they relate to their respective lands.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' lands were included in the acquisition proceedings for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout, and they challenged the validity of the notifications on legal grounds.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed directly before the High Court of Karnataka. No prior proceedings are mentioned in the provided text.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Sections 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Land Acquisition Bangalore Development Authority Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Preliminary Notification Final Notification Writ Petition Section 4(1) BDA Act

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Entertainment Expenditure Dispute; Ordinary Meals as Business Necessity Not Covered Under Section 37(2A) Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court Holds That Expenditure on Provision of Ordinary Meals to Cu... 2026-09-17 01:59:22
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Power Trust's Appeal Against CIRP Initiation for Appellant(s), Upholds NCLAT Order Admitting Section 7 IBC Application Due to Default and Non-Compliance with Restructuring Conditions 2026-09-17 01:59:21
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?