Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010023912010_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-31 14:45:30
  • 78
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010023912010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 35

Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 (and connected matters)

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil

R. Shankaran

State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department; Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority; Senior Land Acquisition Officer, BDA

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

The litigation involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the acquisition of land by the Bangalore Development Authority for the formation of a layout named Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the preliminary notification dated 21.05.2008 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and/or Sections 17(1) and 17(3) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, and the final notification dated 18.02.2010 issued under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act, insofar as they relate to their respective lands.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' lands were included in the acquisition proceedings for the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout, and they challenged the validity of the notifications on legal grounds.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed directly before the High Court of Karnataka. No prior proceedings are mentioned in the provided text.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Sections 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Land Acquisition Bangalore Development Authority Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Preliminary Notification Final Notification Writ Petition Section 4(1) BDA Act

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Concerning a Company That Ceased Electricity Supply Business. Assessee Company Denied Deduction Under Section 10(2)(xv) of Income Tax Act, 1922 Because No Business Was Carried On in Acc... 2026-11-01 06:38:14
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining English Proceedings in Breach of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in EDA held binding despite subsequent MOU; strong cause not shown by defendants. 2026-11-01 06:38:12
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?