Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. The petitions sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Karnataka BDA Act, 1976 regarding Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-02 16:41:40
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010305812010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 52

W.P.No.32186/2010 & connected matters

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil, A. Lokanath

Sri. R. Shankaran & Others

State of Karnataka, Bangalore Development Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued for the formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by Bangalore Development Authority.

Filing Reason

Acquisition of lands belonging to petitioners for the layout.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Sections 17(1), 17(3), 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition preliminary notification final notification BDA Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout writ petition

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Disposes of Criminal Revision as Applicant Released on Bail, Directs Trial to Proceed. Co-accused statement held not substantive evidence but revision disposed of without merits as chargesheet filed. 2026-08-02 16:41:40
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. The petitions sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Karnataka BDA Act, 197... 2026-08-02 16:41:40
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation Burden of Proof benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?