Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Seek Quashing of KAT Order in A.No.1212-1250/2010.
23 Sep 2014...
Search Results for "Chief Secretary"
5887 result(s) found
Found 5887 result(s)
High Court
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.
1 Jul 2024The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...
- 682
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition of Retired Judicial Member of Railway Claims Tribunal — Notification Denying Pension Quashed as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional. Pension is a right under Article 300A and denial without authority of law is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16.
7 May 2012The petitioner, Prabhakar H. Parab, a retired Judicial Member of the Railway Claims Tribunal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...
- 52
High Court
- 62
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order Dated 28-02-2018 Dismissing Writs Filed by Gram Panchayat Office-Bearers. Appeals Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act Question Correctness of Single Judge’s Refusal to Grant Relief in Panchayat Leadership Disputes.
12 Oct 2018This batch of writ appeals was filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 before a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at B...
- 39
High Court
Madras High Court Restrains State from Granting Permanent Public Employment to Kin of Stampede Victims; Permits Temporary Appointments Subject to Judicial Review. The Court Holds That Compassionate Appointments Must Adhere to Constitutional Provisions Under Articles 14 and 16 and Cannot Be a Colourable Exercise of Power.
27 Jul 2026The writ petitions, filed as Public Interest Litigations under Article 226 of the Constitution, sought to restrain the State Government from granting ...
- 54
High Court
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. The court held that the failure to consider the detenu's representation expeditiously renders the continued detention illegal, emphasizing the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.
30 Jul 2014The petitioner, Ashish Robert Felix, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Certificates for Police Recruits. Claimants Failed to Prove 'Thakur' Tribe Status; Scrutiny Committee's Orders Upheld.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves five writ petitions filed by individuals whose Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificates claiming to belong to the 'Thakur' tribe were i...
- 94
