Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010138832018_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-19 14:50:24
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010138832018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 81

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) and connected cases

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J., Sri K.N.Phaneendra, Smt. Vaishali Hegde, Sri Vishwajith Shetty, Sri Dinesh Rao, Smt. Prathima Honnapura, Sri S.Rajashekar

Mr. Ravindra Nayak

Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, State of Karnataka, Smt. Kavita Sanil, Sri Mahabala Marla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the validity of notifications issued by the State Government reserving certain wards for specific categories in urban local body elections.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 regarding ward reservations and directing reservations as per draft notifications or general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the final reservation notifications were arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to the draft notifications or legal provisions.

Procedural History

Several writ petitions were filed challenging notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 regarding reservation of wards for urban local body elections. The petitions were grouped together for hearing.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ petition election reservation notification urban local body ward Article 226 Article 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Murder Case — Conviction Upheld Based on Eyewitness Testimony. The court found sufficient corroborative evidence to support the conviction under Sections 302/149 IPC despite some discrepancies in witness accounts. 2026-11-01 19:49:35
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Preventi... 2026-11-01 19:49:26
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation Jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?