Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010138832018_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-03 05:10:16
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010138832018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 81

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) and connected cases

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J., Sri K.N.Phaneendra, Smt. Vaishali Hegde, Sri Vishwajith Shetty, Sri Dinesh Rao, Smt. Prathima Honnapura, Sri S.Rajashekar

Mr. Ravindra Nayak

Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, State of Karnataka, Smt. Kavita Sanil, Sri Mahabala Marla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the validity of notifications issued by the State Government reserving certain wards for specific categories in urban local body elections.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 regarding ward reservations and directing reservations as per draft notifications or general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the final reservation notifications were arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to the draft notifications or legal provisions.

Procedural History

Several writ petitions were filed challenging notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 regarding reservation of wards for urban local body elections. The petitions were grouped together for hearing.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ petition election reservation notification urban local body ward Article 226 Article 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Ex-Judicial Officer Challenging Dismissal for Misconduct. Departmental inquiry found to be fair and charges proved, upholding dismissal under Rule 5 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, ... 2026-08-03 05:10:16
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Appeal from High Court Order Granting Interim Custody of Vehicles in Criminal Misappropriation Case. Appellant Seeks Custody Based on Registration Certificates; Respondent Company Claims Possession Under Undertaking. 2026-08-03 05:10:16
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof limitation benefit of doubt Article 226 land acquisition
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?