Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Seek Quashing of KAT Order in A.No.1212-1250/2010.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-10-21 04:12:08
  • 87
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010245072010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (09) 42

WRIT PETITION Nos.6842-6880/2010 (S-KAT) C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.15002/2011 & 21131-21146/2011,16948-16995/2010, 8215/2010, 8715/2010 & 8906/2010, 10106/2010 & 12726-12763/2010, 17294-17327/2010, 17481/2010 & 17485-17490/2010 & 17723-17727/2010, 19401/2011 & 21520-21530/2011, 24525/2010, 41905-41908/2010 & 6747-6758/2011, 908-911/2011, 103593/2014 & 103620-103657/2014 (S-KAT)

2014-09-23

D.H. Waghela, H.G. Ramesh

H. Subramanya Jois, K.C. Shanthakumar, Madhusudan R Naik, Ravindra D.K., J. Prashanth, S.M. Babu, C.M. Nagabhushan, P.V. Chandrashekar, H. Kantharaj, V. Lakshminarayan, L. Vijayakumar, D.N. Nanjundareddy

Mahesh A C and others

State of Karnataka and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

To quash the order dated 02.03.2010 passed by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal in A.No.1212-1250/2010.

Procedural History

The matter was filed as Writ Petition Nos.6842-6880/2010 and connected cases before the Karnataka High Court challenging the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal's order dated 02.03.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Writ petition Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Article 226 Article 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remits Appeal for Fresh Consideration on Merits Due to Procedural Irregularities. High Court's Remand Lacked Justification as Existing Evidence Sufficiency Was Not Assessed Under Order XLI Rule 23A of CPC. 2026-11-01 14:32:58
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment. 2026-11-01 14:32:57
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Murder natural justice acquittal Compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?