Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Certificates for Police Recruits. Claimants Failed to Prove 'Thakur' Tribe Status; Scrutiny Committee's Orders Upheld.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment involves five writ petitions filed by individuals whose Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificates claiming to belong to the 'Thakur' tribe were invalidated by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar Division. The petitioners had obtained employment in the police department based on these certificates. The court examined the validity of the committee's orders and the legal principles governing caste certificate verification. The court held that the burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish tribal status through valid documents, and the committee's decision was based on a thorough inquiry. The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the invalidation of the certificates and the consequential termination of services, but directed that no recovery of salary already paid be made.

Headnote

A) Caste Certificate - Scheduled Tribe - Validity - Burden of Proof - The burden lies on the claimant to prove that he belongs to a Scheduled Tribe by producing valid documents such as pre-constitutional records, school leaving certificates of ancestors, and other contemporaneous evidence. Mere possession of a caste certificate issued by a revenue officer is not conclusive. (Paras 1-10)

B) Caste Certificate - Scrutiny Committee - Powers - The Scrutiny Committee has the power to conduct a thorough inquiry and invalidate a caste certificate if it finds that the claimant does not belong to the notified tribe. The committee's decision is based on an evaluation of documentary and oral evidence. (Paras 11-20)

C) Caste Certificate - Employment - Consequences of Invalidity - If a caste certificate is invalidated, the employee is liable to be removed from service and any benefits obtained on the basis of the invalid certificate are liable to be withdrawn. However, the court may consider the length of service and other equities before ordering recovery. (Paras 21-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee was justified in invalidating the caste certificates of the petitioners claiming to belong to the 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe, and whether the petitioners are entitled to retain the benefits obtained on the basis of such certificates.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed all five writ petitions, upholding the orders of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the caste certificates. The court directed that the petitioners' services be terminated, but no recovery of salary already paid shall be made.

Law Points

  • Caste certificate scrutiny
  • Scheduled Tribe validation
  • burden of proof on claimant
  • validity of caste certificates for employment
  • Maharashtra Scheduled Castes
  • Scheduled Tribes
  • De-notified Tribes
  • (Vimukta Jatis)
  • Nomadic Tribes
  • Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act
  • 2000
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (08) 21

Writ Petition No.2136 of 2011, Writ Petition No.5340 of 2010, Writ Petition No.8900 of 2010, Writ Petition No.7740 of 2010, Writ Petition No.7737 of 2010

0000-00-00

Mr.S.R.Barlinge, Mr.Sandeep Deshmukh, Mr.V.B.Patil, Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, Mr.M.N.Navandar

Shrikant Chandrakant Saindane, Sandip Shriram Thakur, Gorakh Uttam Thakur, Gajendra Bhaskar Thakur, Someshwar Waman Thakur

State of Maharashtra, Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Commissioner of Police, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapith

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the caste certificates of the petitioners.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of the committee's orders and a direction to the respondents to continue their employment in the police department.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' caste certificates were invalidated by the Scrutiny Committee, leading to termination of their services.

Previous Decisions

The Scrutiny Committee had passed orders invalidating the caste certificates after conducting an inquiry.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the caste certificate is sustainable in law. Whether the petitioners are entitled to retain the benefits of employment obtained on the basis of invalid caste certificates.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that they belong to the 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe and that the committee erred in invalidating their certificates. The respondents argued that the committee conducted a proper inquiry and found that the petitioners failed to produce valid documents to prove their tribal status.

Ratio Decidendi

The burden of proof to establish Scheduled Tribe status lies on the claimant. The Scrutiny Committee's decision, based on a thorough inquiry and lack of valid documents, is entitled to deference. Invalid caste certificates cannot be the basis for retaining employment benefits.

Judgment Excerpts

The burden lies on the claimant to prove that he belongs to a Scheduled Tribe by producing valid documents. The Scrutiny Committee has the power to conduct a thorough inquiry and invalidate a caste certificate if it finds that the claimant does not belong to the notified tribe.

Procedural History

The petitioners obtained caste certificates claiming 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe status and secured employment in the police department. The Scrutiny Committee initiated verification and after inquiry invalidated the certificates. The petitioners challenged the committee's orders by filing writ petitions in the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes, (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses ESI Corporation's Appeal in Coverage Dispute. Employer's Application Under Section 75 of ESI Act Allowed as Corporation Failed to Prove Employment of 10 or More Persons.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Certificates for Police Recruits. Claimants Failed to Prove 'Thakur' Tribe Status; Scrutiny Committee's Orders Upheld.