Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010306832010_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-16 12:30:49
  • 103
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010306832010_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 54

W.P.No.32186/2010

2014-07-11

Anand Byrareddy

Udaykumar H.B., D. Nagaraj, Jayakumar S Patil

Sri. R. Shankaran

State of Karnataka, Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority, Senior Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore Development Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging land acquisition notifications

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010

Filing Reason

Acquisition of their lands for the formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by Bangalore Development Authority

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1)
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976: Section 17(1), Section 17(3), Section 19(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
land acquisition preliminary notification final notification BDA Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout writ petition quash

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Kerala Electricity Surcharge Act, 1989. Court Examines Whether Levy on Supply of Electricity Falls Under Entry 53 of State List and Whether Retrospective Validation Under Section 11 is Permissible. 2026-09-16 18:02:23
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Considers Whether Discharge of Habitual Offender Airmen Under Air Force Rules Amounts to Punitive Removal. Rule 15(2)(g)(ii) of Air Force Rules, 1969 Provides for Discharge Simpliciter While Rule 18 Provides for Punitive Removal; High C... 2026-09-16 18:02:23
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?