Search Results for "Works Contract Service"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Physical Bid Submission in Online Tender Process. Court Holds That Government Resolution Dated 27.09.2018 Mandating Online Submission Does Not Violate Principles of Natural Justice or Arbitrary Exercise of Power.

The petitioner, M/s. AGC-SCCPL JV, a joint venture bidder, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking a direction to the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Tender Evaluation in Solid Waste Management Contract. Technical Evaluation Upheld as Per Tender Conditions and No Malafides Established.

The petitioner, A2Z Infra Services Ltd., challenged the technical evaluation of a tender issued by Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) for door-to-door...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition and Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Objection. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is a prima facie matter at Section 11 stage, and stamp duty is for arbitrator to decide.

The Petitioner, Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...