Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition and Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Objection. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is a prima facie matter at Section 11 stage, and stamp duty is for arbitrator to decide.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a sub-contract dated 14th June 2013 with the Respondent, Garware-Wall Ropes Limited. The sub-contract contained an arbitration clause providing for disputes to be resolved by a sole arbitrator appointed jointly by the parties. Disputes arose, and the Petitioner invoked the arbitration clause, but the parties could not agree on an arbitrator. The Respondent opposed the petition primarily on the ground that the sub-contract was unstamped or insufficiently stamped, and therefore, no arbitration agreement existed in law. The Court, after hearing arguments, held that at the Section 11 stage, it is only required to take a prima facie view of the existence of an arbitration agreement. The issue of stamp duty goes to the admissibility of the agreement as evidence and is a matter for the arbitrator to decide under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act. The Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, leaving all contentions open, including the stamp duty issue.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - The Court, at the stage of Section 11, is only required to take a prima facie view of the existence of an arbitration agreement. Objections regarding stamp duty on the underlying contract are matters for the arbitrator to decide and do not preclude the appointment of an arbitrator. (Paras 1-31)

B) Stamp Act - Objection as to Stamp Duty - The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - The issue of whether the agreement is sufficiently stamped is a question that goes to the admissibility of the agreement as evidence, not to the jurisdiction of the arbitrator. The arbitrator can decide this issue under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act. (Paras 20-31)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Court can appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when the underlying agreement is alleged to be unstamped or insufficiently stamped.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. All contentions, including the stamp duty issue, are left open for the arbitrator to decide.

Law Points

  • Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • existence of arbitration agreement
  • stamp duty
  • prima facie view
  • appointment of arbitrator
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018:BHC-AS:7303

Arbitration Petition No.24 of 2017

2018-03-09

B.P. Colabawalla

2018:BHC-AS:7303

Ms. Ridhi Nyati I/b Ashwin Shanker, for the Petitioner; Mr. Ashish Kamat a/w Mr. Kunal Mehta, Ms Yasmin Godrej and Ms. Priyanka Deshmukh I/b Crawford Bayley and Co, for the Respondent

Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering Limited

Garware-Wall Ropes Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a sole arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a sub-contract.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the parties under the sub-contract dated 14th June 2013, and the arbitration clause was invoked but the parties could not agree on an arbitrator.

Issues

Whether the Court can appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when the underlying agreement is alleged to be unstamped or insufficiently stamped.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the arbitration agreement exists and the Court should appoint an arbitrator. Respondent argued that the sub-contract is unstamped/insufficiently stamped, and therefore no arbitration agreement exists in law.

Ratio Decidendi

At the stage of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court is only required to take a prima facie view of the existence of an arbitration agreement. Objections regarding stamp duty on the underlying contract are matters for the arbitrator to decide under Section 16 of the Act and do not preclude the appointment of an arbitrator.

Judgment Excerpts

This Arbitration Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes which have been arisen between the Petitioner and the Respondent under the sub-contract dated 14th June, 2013. The Court, at the stage of Section 11, is only required to take a prima facie view of the existence of an arbitration agreement.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It was argued on 5th February 2018, and the parties were given time to file written submissions. The judgment was pronounced on 9th March 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11, Section 16
  • Indian Stamp Act, 1899:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition and Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Objection. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is a prima facie matter at Section 11 stage, and stamp duty is for arbitrator to decide.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation for Unfairly Dismissed Watchman in Industrial Dispute Case. Labour Court's Lumpsum Compensation of Rs.60,000 Set Aside and Increased to Rs.1,50,000 for Violation of Sections 25F, 25G, and 25H of Industrial Dis...